Timeline for "Oddity" in counting intervals of the Tamari lattice
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2022 at 20:46 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Capitalise title while this is on the front page; names of papers; PDF -> abs
|
| Jan 21, 2022 at 20:16 | history | edited | F. C. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo in title
|
| Feb 27, 2021 at 8:39 | comment | added | F. C. | There is a natural involution on Tamari intervals, namely reversal and exchange of bounds, with fixed points counted by 1, 1, 3, 4, 15, 22, 91, 140, 612, 969, 4389, 7084, 32890, 53820, ... One expects an instance of the q=-1 phenomenon for these numbers. | |
| Feb 27, 2021 at 8:17 | comment | added | F. C. | More generally, odd values seem to appear for indices in oeis.org/A263133 . | |
| Jun 25, 2020 at 18:57 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jun 25, 2020 at 3:28 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2020 at 3:07 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 25, 2020 at 2:45 | history | asked | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |