Skip to main content
spelling of Verbitsky
Source Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102

I think it is a result of VerbitsyVerbitsky (probably proved in Coherent sheaves on general K3 surfaces and tori) that if $M$ is a very general (non-algebraic) K3 surface then the condition you want is satisfied.

I think it is a result of Verbitsy (probably proved in Coherent sheaves on general K3 surfaces and tori) that if $M$ is a very general (non-algebraic) K3 surface then the condition you want is satisfied.

I think it is a result of Verbitsky (probably proved in Coherent sheaves on general K3 surfaces and tori) that if $M$ is a very general (non-algebraic) K3 surface then the condition you want is satisfied.

Name of 'here'
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

I think it is a result of Verbitsy (probably proved here:in https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0205210Coherent sheaves on general K3 surfaces and tori) that if $M$ is a very general (non-algebraic) K3 surface then the condition you want is satisfied.

I think it is a result of Verbitsy (probably proved here: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0205210) that if $M$ is a very general (non-algebraic) K3 surface then the condition you want is satisfied.

I think it is a result of Verbitsy (probably proved in Coherent sheaves on general K3 surfaces and tori) that if $M$ is a very general (non-algebraic) K3 surface then the condition you want is satisfied.

Source Link
Sasha
  • 39.3k
  • 2
  • 54
  • 104

I think it is a result of Verbitsy (probably proved here: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0205210) that if $M$ is a very general (non-algebraic) K3 surface then the condition you want is satisfied.