Timeline for Canon in algebraic combinatorics and how to study
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 13, 2021 at 17:53 | answer | added | Timothy Chow | timeline score: 6 | |
Oct 26, 2020 at 6:27 | vote | accept | nobody | ||
Jun 20, 2020 at 4:13 | answer | added | Igor Pak | timeline score: 13 | |
Jun 18, 2020 at 16:56 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Matroid theory now has several long monographs devoted to it: Oxley, Welsh, White, White again... | |
Jun 18, 2020 at 16:51 | comment | added | darij grinberg | The "canonical" reference on crystal bases is now the eponymous book by Bump and Schilling. On Coxeter groups, most tend to recommend Björner/Brenti for a first combinatorial introduction (there are also notes by Heckman geared more towards geometers). | |
Jun 18, 2020 at 16:33 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | I think algebraic topologists and algebraic geometers might dispute your first sentence. | |
Jun 18, 2020 at 16:30 | comment | added | darij grinberg | There is no established concept of what algebraic combinatorics is (though this isn't much different from other subjects: e.g., do Gröbner bases belong to algebraic geometry?). At best you can try to cluster mathematicians according to their joint knowledge. EC1-2 form a major cluster in the sense that someone who knows the material of one chapter is rather likely to know that of another; still, very few are really deeply familiar with the whole territory. | |
Jun 18, 2020 at 16:27 | history | edited | David White | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed some typos, added a link to a book
|
Jun 18, 2020 at 8:45 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | Can the criminality be defeated? No. Should we fight against the criminality? Yes. The same with exercises in EC 1,2. | |
Jun 18, 2020 at 7:11 | history | edited | bof | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed typo
|
Jun 18, 2020 at 1:44 | history | asked | nobody | CC BY-SA 4.0 |