Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
edited body
Source Link
Kevin
  • 539
  • 3
  • 11

Let $H_1, \ldots, H_m$$H_1, \ldots, H_n$ be $m$$n$ linearly independent hyperplanes in $k^n$, for some arbitrary field $k$. Let $X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_m$$X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_n$. Is it true that if $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_r)$$F=(f_1, \ldots, f_n)$ is a polynomial map from $k^n$ to $k^r$$k^n$, such that $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$, then $\sum \deg(f_i) \ge m$$\sum \deg(f_i) \ge n$?

This holds under the stronger condition that for all $a \in X$, $F(a)$ has at least one coordinate equal to zero, and for all $a \notin X$, $F(a)$ has all coordinates nonzero: $\prod f_i$ then cuts out $X$, but since any polynomial cutting out $X$ has degree at least $m$$n$, the conclusion follows.

More generally, for a variety $X \subseteq k^n$, define $C(X)$ to be the minimum of the sum of the degrees of the coordinate functions over all polynomial maps $F$ where $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$. Is this quantity equivalent to something that's well known? You trivially have $C(X) \le n$ by taking $F$ to be the identity map. Also, if $X$ is defined by equations whose degree-sum equals $m$, $C(X) \le m$. Is one of these inequalities always sharp?

Let $H_1, \ldots, H_m$ be $m$ linearly independent hyperplanes in $k^n$, for some arbitrary field $k$. Let $X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_m$. Is it true that if $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_r)$ is a polynomial map from $k^n$ to $k^r$, such that $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$, then $\sum \deg(f_i) \ge m$?

This holds under the stronger condition that for all $a \in X$, $F(a)$ has at least one coordinate equal to zero, and for all $a \notin X$, $F(a)$ has all coordinates nonzero: $\prod f_i$ then cuts out $X$, but since any polynomial cutting out $X$ has degree at least $m$, the conclusion follows.

More generally, for a variety $X \subseteq k^n$, define $C(X)$ to be the minimum of the sum of the degrees of the coordinate functions over all polynomial maps $F$ where $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$. Is this quantity equivalent to something that's well known? You trivially have $C(X) \le n$ by taking $F$ to be the identity map. Also, if $X$ is defined by equations whose degree-sum equals $m$, $C(X) \le m$. Is one of these inequalities always sharp?

Let $H_1, \ldots, H_n$ be $n$ linearly independent hyperplanes in $k^n$, for some arbitrary field $k$. Let $X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_n$. Is it true that if $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_n)$ is a polynomial map from $k^n$ to $k^n$, such that $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$, then $\sum \deg(f_i) \ge n$?

This holds under the stronger condition that for all $a \in X$, $F(a)$ has at least one coordinate equal to zero, and for all $a \notin X$, $F(a)$ has all coordinates nonzero: $\prod f_i$ then cuts out $X$, but since any polynomial cutting out $X$ has degree at least $n$, the conclusion follows.

More generally, for a variety $X \subseteq k^n$, define $C(X)$ to be the minimum of the sum of the degrees of the coordinate functions over all polynomial maps $F$ where $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$. Is this quantity equivalent to something that's well known? You trivially have $C(X) \le n$ by taking $F$ to be the identity map. Also, if $X$ is defined by equations whose degree-sum equals $m$, $C(X) \le m$. Is one of these inequalities always sharp?

Notice added Draw attention by Kevin
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Kevin
deleted 72 characters in body
Source Link
Kevin
  • 539
  • 3
  • 11

Let $H_1, \ldots, H_m$ be $m$ linearly independent hyperplanes in $k^n$, for some arbitrary field $k$. Let $X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_m$. Is it true that if $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_r)$ is a polynomial map from $k^n$ to $k^r$, such that $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$, then $\sum \deg(f_i) \ge m$?

This holds under the stronger condition that for all $a \in X$, $F(a)$ has at least one coordinate equal to zero, and for all $a \notin X$, $F(a)$ has all coordinates nonzero: $\prod f_i$ then cuts out $X$, but since any polynomial cutting out $X$ has degree at least $m$, the conclusion follows.

More generally, for a variety $X \subseteq k^n$, define $C(X)$ to be the minimum of the sum of the degrees of the coordinate functions over all polynomial maps $F$ where $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$. Is this quantity equivalent to something that's well known? You trivially have $C(X) \le n$ by taking $F$ to be the identity map. Also, if $X$ is defined by equations whose degree-sum equals $m$, $C(X) \le m$. These two cases don't cover everything though; for example, if $X$ is a point in $\mathbb{R}^n$ then $C(X) \le 2$.Is one of these inequalities always sharp?

Let $H_1, \ldots, H_m$ be $m$ linearly independent hyperplanes in $k^n$, for some arbitrary field $k$. Let $X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_m$. Is it true that if $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_r)$ is a polynomial map from $k^n$ to $k^r$, such that $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$, then $\sum \deg(f_i) \ge m$?

This holds under the stronger condition that for all $a \in X$, $F(a)$ has at least one coordinate equal to zero, and for all $a \notin X$, $F(a)$ has all coordinates nonzero: $\prod f_i$ then cuts out $X$, but since any polynomial cutting out $X$ has degree at least $m$, the conclusion follows.

More generally, for a variety $X \subseteq k^n$, define $C(X)$ to be the minimum of the sum of the degrees of the coordinate functions over all polynomial maps $F$ where $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$. Is this quantity equivalent to something that's well known? You trivially have $C(X) \le n$ by taking $F$ to be the identity map. Also, if $X$ is defined by equations whose degree-sum equals $m$, $C(X) \le m$. These two cases don't cover everything though; for example, if $X$ is a point in $\mathbb{R}^n$ then $C(X) \le 2$.

Let $H_1, \ldots, H_m$ be $m$ linearly independent hyperplanes in $k^n$, for some arbitrary field $k$. Let $X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_m$. Is it true that if $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_r)$ is a polynomial map from $k^n$ to $k^r$, such that $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$, then $\sum \deg(f_i) \ge m$?

This holds under the stronger condition that for all $a \in X$, $F(a)$ has at least one coordinate equal to zero, and for all $a \notin X$, $F(a)$ has all coordinates nonzero: $\prod f_i$ then cuts out $X$, but since any polynomial cutting out $X$ has degree at least $m$, the conclusion follows.

More generally, for a variety $X \subseteq k^n$, define $C(X)$ to be the minimum of the sum of the degrees of the coordinate functions over all polynomial maps $F$ where $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$. Is this quantity equivalent to something that's well known? You trivially have $C(X) \le n$ by taking $F$ to be the identity map. Also, if $X$ is defined by equations whose degree-sum equals $m$, $C(X) \le m$. Is one of these inequalities always sharp?

added 469 characters in body
Source Link
Kevin
  • 539
  • 3
  • 11

Let $H_1, \ldots, H_m$ be $m$ linearly independent hyperplanes in $k^n$, for some arbitrary field $k$. Let $X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_m$. Is it true that if $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_r)$ is a polynomial map from $k^n$ to $k^r$, such that $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$, then $\sum \deg(f_i) \ge m$?

This holds under the stronger condition that for all $a \in X$, $F(a)$ has at least one coordinate equal to zero, and for all $a \notin X$, $F(a)$ has all coordinates nonzero: $\prod f_i$ then cuts out $X$, but since any polynomial cutting out $X$ has degree at least $m$, the conclusion follows.

I am particularly interested inMore generally, for a variety $X \subseteq k^n$, define $C(X)$ to be the case whenminimum of the sum of the degrees of the coordinate functions over all polynomial maps $\deg(f_i) = 2$$F$ where $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$. Is this quantity equivalent to something that's well known? You trivially have $C(X) \le n$ by taking $F$ to be the identity map. Also, if $X$ is defined by equations whose degree-sum equals $m$, $C(X) \le m$. These two cases don't cover everything though; for example, if $X$ is a point in $\mathbb{R}^n$ then $C(X) \le 2$.

Let $H_1, \ldots, H_m$ be $m$ linearly independent hyperplanes in $k^n$, for some arbitrary field $k$. Let $X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_m$. Is it true that if $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_r)$ is a polynomial map from $k^n$ to $k^r$, such that $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$, then $\sum \deg(f_i) \ge m$?

This holds under the stronger condition that for all $a \in X$, $F(a)$ has at least one coordinate equal to zero, and for all $a \notin X$, $F(a)$ has all coordinates nonzero: $\prod f_i$ then cuts out $X$, but since any polynomial cutting out $X$ has degree at least $m$, the conclusion follows.

I am particularly interested in the case when $\deg(f_i) = 2$.

Let $H_1, \ldots, H_m$ be $m$ linearly independent hyperplanes in $k^n$, for some arbitrary field $k$. Let $X = H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_m$. Is it true that if $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_r)$ is a polynomial map from $k^n$ to $k^r$, such that $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$, then $\sum \deg(f_i) \ge m$?

This holds under the stronger condition that for all $a \in X$, $F(a)$ has at least one coordinate equal to zero, and for all $a \notin X$, $F(a)$ has all coordinates nonzero: $\prod f_i$ then cuts out $X$, but since any polynomial cutting out $X$ has degree at least $m$, the conclusion follows.

More generally, for a variety $X \subseteq k^n$, define $C(X)$ to be the minimum of the sum of the degrees of the coordinate functions over all polynomial maps $F$ where $F(X) \cap F(k^n - X) = \emptyset$. Is this quantity equivalent to something that's well known? You trivially have $C(X) \le n$ by taking $F$ to be the identity map. Also, if $X$ is defined by equations whose degree-sum equals $m$, $C(X) \le m$. These two cases don't cover everything though; for example, if $X$ is a point in $\mathbb{R}^n$ then $C(X) \le 2$.

deleted 110 characters in body
Source Link
Kevin
  • 539
  • 3
  • 11
Loading
Source Link
Kevin
  • 539
  • 3
  • 11
Loading