Skip to main content
changed irrelevant tags, minor formatting
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Hypercylic Operatorsoperators with Setssets of Hypercyclic Vectors Almost Covering The Spacehypercyclic vectors almost covering the space

Let $\{T_i\}_{i \in I}$ be a setfamily of Hypercylichypercylic operators on a separable Banach space $X$. From the transitivity theorem, we know that $HC(T_i)$, the set of vectors $x \in X$ with $\{T_i^n(x):n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ dense in $X$, is itself a dense $G_{\delta}$ subset of $X$.

It is known, or when is it the case that:

  • There exists a finite-dimensional subspace $Y$ of $X$ such that $$ X-\bigcup_{i \in I} HC(T_i)\subset Y$$
  • There is no finite-dimensional subspace $Z\subseteq X$ such that $$ X-\bigcup_{j=1}^n \, HC(T_{i_j})\subseteq Z $$ for any finite sequence $i_1,\dots,i_n$ in $I$

Hypercylic Operators with Sets of Hypercyclic Vectors Almost Covering The Space

Let $\{T_i\}_{i \in I}$ be a set of Hypercylic operators on a separable Banach space $X$. From the transitivity theorem, we know that $HC(T_i)$, the set of vectors $x \in X$ with $\{T_i^n(x):n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ dense in $X$, is itself a dense $G_{\delta}$ subset of $X$.

It is known, or when is it the case that:

  • There exists a finite-dimensional subspace $Y$ of $X$ such that $$ X-\bigcup_{i \in I} HC(T_i)\subset Y$$
  • There is no finite-dimensional subspace $Z\subseteq X$ such that $$ X-\bigcup_{j=1}^n \, HC(T_{i_j})\subseteq Z $$ for any finite sequence $i_1,\dots,i_n$ in $I$

Hypercylic operators with sets of hypercyclic vectors almost covering the space

Let $\{T_i\}_{i \in I}$ be a family of hypercylic operators on a separable Banach space $X$. From the transitivity theorem, we know that $HC(T_i)$, the set of vectors $x \in X$ with $\{T_i^n(x):n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ dense in $X$, is itself a dense $G_{\delta}$ subset of $X$.

It is known, or when is it the case that:

  • There exists a finite-dimensional subspace $Y$ of $X$ such that $$ X-\bigcup_{i \in I} HC(T_i)\subset Y$$
  • There is no finite-dimensional subspace $Z\subseteq X$ such that $$ X-\bigcup_{j=1}^n \, HC(T_{i_j})\subseteq Z $$ for any finite sequence $i_1,\dots,i_n$ in $I$
Source Link
ABIM
  • 5.4k
  • 3
  • 19
  • 41

Hypercylic Operators with Sets of Hypercyclic Vectors Almost Covering The Space

Let $\{T_i\}_{i \in I}$ be a set of Hypercylic operators on a separable Banach space $X$. From the transitivity theorem, we know that $HC(T_i)$, the set of vectors $x \in X$ with $\{T_i^n(x):n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ dense in $X$, is itself a dense $G_{\delta}$ subset of $X$.

It is known, or when is it the case that:

  • There exists a finite-dimensional subspace $Y$ of $X$ such that $$ X-\bigcup_{i \in I} HC(T_i)\subset Y$$
  • There is no finite-dimensional subspace $Z\subseteq X$ such that $$ X-\bigcup_{j=1}^n \, HC(T_{i_j})\subseteq Z $$ for any finite sequence $i_1,\dots,i_n$ in $I$