Timeline for Name for a kind of topological property?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2010 at 1:57 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | Don't know about Banach, but it sure worked for Tate! | |
| Aug 21, 2010 at 0:23 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | "Class S" is extra nice since your name starts with S. Hey, it worked for Banach. | |
| Aug 20, 2010 at 23:06 | answer | added | Pietro Majer | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 20, 2010 at 21:01 | comment | added | Jeff Strom | @Mariano. I was thinking of "regular." | |
| Aug 20, 2010 at 19:45 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | I should have said this before: if you are going to pick an adjective, please oh please let it be not «admissible»! | |
| Aug 20, 2010 at 18:25 | comment | added | babubba | Why not "disjoint-communicative"? (after the affine communication lemma in Ravi Vakil's notes) | |
| Aug 20, 2010 at 15:56 | comment | added | Andrea Ferretti | I find adjectives more readable. Compare "Take a good property and assume..." with "Take a property of class S and assume..." | |
| Aug 20, 2010 at 15:48 | history | edited | Jeff Strom | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 220 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2010 at 15:39 | comment | added | Willie Wong | Rather than using pedestrian adjectives like excellent or good (unless you are really trying to get it named after you), it maybe better to make a definition to the effect that a property (P) satisfying conditions (1) and (2) are said to be in class S. | |
| Aug 20, 2010 at 14:51 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | I would say that hereditary is generally reserved for properties which are inherited by all subspaces, not just open ones. To be honest, I would not introduce a name for such a thing, but only a shorthand («Let us, for briefness, call excellent a property such that ... and ...», and then talk about «excellent properties»; if the concept catches up, this makes it more probable that you get immortalized with «Stromian property» or something!) | |
| Aug 20, 2010 at 14:47 | history | edited | Jeff Strom | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2010 at 14:42 | history | edited | Jeff Strom | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 7 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2010 at 14:36 | history | asked | Jeff Strom | CC BY-SA 2.5 |