Timeline for A generalization of integral Poincaré duality
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jun 1, 2020 at 15:19 | vote | accept | Matt | ||
Jun 1, 2020 at 2:30 | answer | added | John Klein | timeline score: 3 | |
May 30, 2020 at 10:07 | history | edited | Matt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edit for alternative acceptable answer
|
May 30, 2020 at 6:46 | comment | added | Drew Heard | I'm not aware of anything else, but that could be more to do with my own ignorance! Looking into the references of D-G-I might help you find other sources (e.g., link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02776063) | |
May 29, 2020 at 17:22 | comment | added | Matt | Thank you for your comment. Are you aware of whether there is a definition of being Gorenstein over $\mathbb{Z}$ without using spectra, or are you saying that there is no such definition available, and the work of Dywer, Greenless, Iyengar addresses this deficiency? | |
May 29, 2020 at 17:03 | comment | added | Drew Heard | A lot of work has been done (starting with Dwyer, Greenlees, and Iyengar) and furthered by Greenlees on when a morphism $f \colon R \to k$ of ring spectra is `Gorenstein', see arxiv.org/abs/math/0510247 for example. Taking $R=C^*(X;\mathbb{Q})$ and $f \colon R \to \mathbb{Q}$ the natural map gives you the above definition. Replacing $\mathbb{Q}$ with $\mathbb{Z}$ gives you a reasonable definition. (The theory tends to work best when $k$ is a field however). | |
May 29, 2020 at 12:33 | history | asked | Matt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |