Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 26, 2022 at 2:38 comment added Tim Campion @FShrike There's no functor out of any product category in general. In this case, you would need to. lift an idempotent on $T = \varinjlim_i T_i$ to an idempotent on each $T_i$, natural in $i$. There's no reason for such a lift to exist in general.
Dec 25, 2022 at 23:44 comment added FShrike @TimCampion What am I missing here? By the Fubini theorem for categorical limits and colimits, any finite colimit of finite colimits is equivalent to a colimit out of the product indexing category - which, as a product of finite categories, is finite - so we see a finite colimit of representables pop out at the end. I’m not sure why we need more complicated arguments
May 27, 2020 at 17:10 comment added Tim Campion I think I see how this works for finite coproducts -- but could you spell out the coequalizers for me?
May 27, 2020 at 6:01 comment added Aurélien Djament The class of presheaves which are finite colimit of representables is stable under finite colimits: the stability under finite coproducts is obvious and the stability under coequalisers is easily seen by hand using the universal property of colimits and the fact that Hom(x,-) commutes with colimits for x representable.
May 27, 2020 at 5:55 comment added Aurélien Djament The class of presheaves which are finite colimit of representables is stable under finite colimits:
May 26, 2020 at 20:38 comment added Tim Campion Hang on -- this shows that $X$ is a finite colimit of (finite colimits of representables) -- a "2-fold" finite colimit of representables. But how does one turn this into an actual finite colimit of representables? I believe that any retract of $\kappa$-small colimits of representables is a $\kappa$-small colimit of representables when $\kappa$ is an uncountable regular cardinal, but I'm not sure about the case $\kappa = \aleph_0$...
May 25, 2020 at 6:28 history answered Aurélien Djament CC BY-SA 4.0