Timeline for Are nuclear operators closed under extensions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2020 at 16:23 | vote | accept | santker heboln | ||
| May 24, 2020 at 23:28 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 24, 2020 at 17:42 | answer | added | Jochen Wengenroth | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 24, 2020 at 17:34 | answer | added | M.González | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 24, 2020 at 17:24 | answer | added | Yemon Choi | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 24, 2020 at 17:09 | comment | added | santker heboln | I mean the first, i.e. $f_1$ has closed range. In that sense what I mean by "topological exactness" is algebraic exactness. | |
| May 24, 2020 at 16:51 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Just to get the terminology straight in my head: by topologically short exact do you mean the morphisms are bounded linear maps but you have short exactness in the category of vector spaces and linear maps? In other words, $f_1$ has closed range, and not just "$f_1(X_1)$ is dense in $\ker(f_2)$"? | |
| May 24, 2020 at 15:48 | history | edited | YCor |
edited tags
|
|
| May 24, 2020 at 15:28 | history | asked | santker heboln | CC BY-SA 4.0 |