Timeline for Is there a 4-polytope without 3-gonal and 4-gonal faces, other than the 120-cell?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2020 at 8:28 | vote | accept | M. Winter | ||
| Jul 20, 2020 at 22:21 | vote | accept | M. Winter | ||
| Jul 20, 2020 at 22:49 | |||||
| May 23, 2020 at 17:17 | history | edited | Dmitri Panov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 432 characters in body
|
| May 23, 2020 at 17:13 | comment | added | Dmitri Panov | I added a reference. Yes, starting with such a polytope you get a tiling of $\mathbb H^4$, in the same way as cubes tile $\mathbb R^n$. And what I say is that you need to take the union of two tiles that share a common hyperface to get a new polytope as you want. This can be continued as far as you want. | |
| May 23, 2020 at 17:11 | history | edited | Dmitri Panov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 432 characters in body
|
| May 23, 2020 at 17:06 | comment | added | M. Winter | Thank you for your answer. I am not familiar with some terminology: 1. what is this "regular compact right-angled 120-cell" in hyperbolic 4-space. Is it like a tiling of 4-space? I wasn't able to find out what a "convex hyperbolic polytope" is via google. 2. What does it mean to "double it on one face"? | |
| May 23, 2020 at 16:54 | history | answered | Dmitri Panov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |