Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Victor TC
  • 795
  • 3
  • 8

Let $X$ be a CW-spectrum. It is well-known that $[\_ ,X]$ is a generalized cohomology theory and, by Brown's representability theorem, every generalized theory is $H$ represented by a spectrum (namely, $H$ has this form).

What about $[X, \_]$? Is it a homology theory? (I do not claim every homology is corepresented by a spectrum).)

Let $X$ be a CW-spectrum. It is well-known that $[\_ ,X]$ is a generalized cohomology theory and, by Brown's representability theorem, every generalized theory is $H$ represented by a spectrum (namely, $H$ has this form).

What about $[X, \_]$? Is it a homology theory? (I do not claim every homology is corepresented by a spectrum).

Let $X$ be a CW-spectrum. It is well-known that $[\_ ,X]$ is a generalized cohomology theory and, by Brown's representability theorem, every generalized theory is $H$ represented by a spectrum (namely, $H$ has this form).

What about $[X, \_]$? Is it a homology theory? (I do not claim every homology is corepresented by a spectrum.)

edited body
Source Link
Victor TC
  • 795
  • 3
  • 8

Let $X$ be a CW-spectrum. It is well-known that $[\_ ,X]$ is a generalized cohomology theory and, by Brown's representability theorem, every generalized theory is $H$ represented by a spectrum (namely, $H$ has this form).

What about $[X, \_]$? Is it a homology theory? (I do not claim every homology is corepresented by a spectrum.).

Let $X$ be a CW-spectrum. It is well-known that $[\_ ,X]$ is a generalized cohomology theory and, by Brown's representability theorem, every generalized theory is $H$ represented by a spectrum (namely, $H$ has this form).

What about $[X, \_]$? Is it a homology theory? (I do not claim every homology is corepresented by a spectrum.)

Let $X$ be a CW-spectrum. It is well-known that $[\_ ,X]$ is a generalized cohomology theory and, by Brown's representability theorem, every generalized theory is $H$ represented by a spectrum (namely, $H$ has this form).

What about $[X, \_]$? Is it a homology theory? (I do not claim every homology is corepresented by a spectrum).

TeX and minor proofreading
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Is [X$[X, _ ]\_]$ a homology theory?

Let $X$ be a CW-spectrum, it. It is well-known that [ _ ,X]$[\_ ,X]$ is a generalized cohomology theory and, by Brown's representability theorem, every generalized theory is $H$ represented by a spectrum (namely, $H$ has this form).

What about [X, _ ]$[X, \_]$?, is Is it a homology theory? (I do not claim every homology is corepresented by a spectrum). Thanks!.)

Is [X, _ ] a homology theory?

Let $X$ be a CW-spectrum, it is well-known that [ _ ,X] is a generalized cohomology theory and, by Brown's representability theorem, every generalized theory is $H$ represented by a spectrum (namely, $H$ has this form).

What about [X, _ ]?, is it a homology theory? (I do not claim every homology is corepresented by a spectrum). Thanks!.

Is $[X, \_]$ a homology theory?

Let $X$ be a CW-spectrum. It is well-known that $[\_ ,X]$ is a generalized cohomology theory and, by Brown's representability theorem, every generalized theory is $H$ represented by a spectrum (namely, $H$ has this form).

What about $[X, \_]$? Is it a homology theory? (I do not claim every homology is corepresented by a spectrum.)

Source Link
Victor TC
  • 795
  • 3
  • 8
Loading