Timeline for The relation between t-structures and derived category
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2020 at 18:26 | comment | added | Maxime Ramzi | @Denis-CharlesCisinski : that seems like it is, thanks a lot ! | |
| Nov 16, 2020 at 18:25 | comment | added | D.-C. Cisinski | @MaximeRamzi I think this is this paper : mathematik.uni-regensburg.de/cisinski/unik.pdf (also arXiv:1911.02338) | |
| Nov 16, 2020 at 18:08 | comment | added | Maxime Ramzi | @Denis-CharlesCisinski : Something seems to have happened since the time you wrote this comment, and I can't see the paper you're referring to. Could you indicate which one that was ? | |
| May 19, 2020 at 15:07 | vote | accept | Amos Kaminski | ||
| May 19, 2020 at 15:07 | vote | accept | Amos Kaminski | ||
| May 19, 2020 at 15:07 | |||||
| May 19, 2020 at 15:07 | vote | accept | Amos Kaminski | ||
| May 19, 2020 at 15:07 | |||||
| May 19, 2020 at 14:54 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
added top-level tag; https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/1457/why-are-mo-tags-formatted-as-they-are
|
|
| May 19, 2020 at 14:07 | comment | added | D.-C. Cisinski | For the case of the bounded derived category, this follows right away from Corollary 7.59 in this paper (for E an abelian category); see Remark 7.60 in loc. cit. For bounded above complexes or unbounded complexes, similar universal properties may be found in Lurie's Higher Algebra, aber you need some nice properties for the heart (being cocomplete and having enough projectives or being Grothendieck). | |
| May 19, 2020 at 12:27 | answer | added | Dan Petersen | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 19, 2020 at 10:21 | comment | added | Simone Virili | I have studied some related questions in a general (strong and stable) Grothendieck derivator in a recent preprint: arxiv.org/abs/1807.01505 | |
| May 19, 2020 at 8:25 | answer | added | Maxime Ramzi | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 18, 2020 at 12:34 | comment | added | Maxime Ramzi | Also : see Dustin Clausen's second comment under his answer here : mathoverflow.net/questions/112412/… | |
| May 18, 2020 at 11:43 | comment | added | Maxime Ramzi | You might be interested in Higher Algebra, theorem 1.3.3.2. and remark 1.3.3.3.. Depending on what you call "derived category", and with suitable hypotheses on $\mathcal D$ there will be a canonical functor $\mathcal D^{-}(\mathcal A)\to \mathcal D$. I think under more suitable hypotheses, this should extend to $\mathcal{D(A)\to D}$ | |
| May 18, 2020 at 10:00 | history | asked | Amos Kaminski | CC BY-SA 4.0 |