Skip to main content
little spelling/grammar aesthetic corrected. removed the [differential-geometry] tag
Source Link
leo monsaingeon
  • 5.4k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 45

In the Lieb's paper "On the lowest eigenvalue of the Laplacian for the intersection of two domains" we foundone finds the following remark: Let $u\in L_{loc}^p(\mathbb{R}^N)$ $\nabla u \in L^{p}$ and $\|\nabla u\|_{p} \leq 1 .$ Set $k=1+\|u\|_{p}^{-p}\left(\text { for }\|u\|_{p} \leq \infty\right)$. Let $B_{x}$ denote the unitary ball in $\mathbb{R}^N$ centered at $x$ with $\beta_x$ the characteristic function. Clearly there is some $x$ such that \begin{equation}\label{lb}\int|\nabla u|^{p} \beta_{x}<k \int|u|^{p} \beta_{x}.\end{equation}

Let $u\in L_{loc}^p(\mathbb{R}^N)$ with $\nabla u \in L^{p}$ and $\|\nabla u\|_{p} \leq 1 .$ Set $k=1+\|u\|_{p}^{-p}\left(\text { for }\|u\|_{p} \leq \infty\right)$. Let $B_{x}$ denote the unitary ball in $\mathbb{R}^N$ centered at $x$, and let $\beta_x$ be its characteristic function. Clearly there is some $x$ such that \begin{equation} \label{lb} \int|\nabla u|^{p} \beta_{x}<k \int|u|^{p} \beta_{x}. \end{equation}

I can't see why thethis inequality \eqref{lb} above is trueholds.

In the Lieb's paper "On the lowest eigenvalue of the Laplacian for the intersection of two domains" we found the following remark: Let $u\in L_{loc}^p(\mathbb{R}^N)$ $\nabla u \in L^{p}$ and $\|\nabla u\|_{p} \leq 1 .$ Set $k=1+\|u\|_{p}^{-p}\left(\text { for }\|u\|_{p} \leq \infty\right)$. Let $B_{x}$ denote the unitary ball in $\mathbb{R}^N$ centered at $x$ with $\beta_x$ the characteristic function. Clearly there is some $x$ such that \begin{equation}\label{lb}\int|\nabla u|^{p} \beta_{x}<k \int|u|^{p} \beta_{x}.\end{equation}

I can't see why the inequality \eqref{lb} above is true.

In Lieb's paper "On the lowest eigenvalue of the Laplacian for the intersection of two domains" one finds the following remark:

Let $u\in L_{loc}^p(\mathbb{R}^N)$ with $\nabla u \in L^{p}$ and $\|\nabla u\|_{p} \leq 1 .$ Set $k=1+\|u\|_{p}^{-p}\left(\text { for }\|u\|_{p} \leq \infty\right)$. Let $B_{x}$ denote the unitary ball in $\mathbb{R}^N$ centered at $x$, and let $\beta_x$ be its characteristic function. Clearly there is some $x$ such that \begin{equation} \label{lb} \int|\nabla u|^{p} \beta_{x}<k \int|u|^{p} \beta_{x}. \end{equation}

I can't see why this inequality holds.

edited body
Source Link

In the Lieb's paper "On the lowest eigenvalue of the Laplacian for the intersection of two domains" we found the following remark: Let $u\in L_{loc}^1(\mathbb{R}^N)$$u\in L_{loc}^p(\mathbb{R}^N)$ $\nabla u \in L^{p}$ and $\|\nabla u\|_{p} \leq 1 .$ Set $k=1+\|u\|_{p}^{-p}\left(\text { for }\|u\|_{p} \leq \infty\right)$. Let $B_{x}$ denote the unitary ball in $\mathbb{R}^N$ centered at $x$ with $\beta_x$ the characteristic function. Clearly there is some $x$ such that \begin{equation}\label{lb}\int|\nabla u|^{p} \beta_{x}<k \int|u|^{p} \beta_{x}.\end{equation}

I can't see why the inequality \eqref{lb} above is true.

In the Lieb's paper "On the lowest eigenvalue of the Laplacian for the intersection of two domains" we found the following remark: Let $u\in L_{loc}^1(\mathbb{R}^N)$ $\nabla u \in L^{p}$ and $\|\nabla u\|_{p} \leq 1 .$ Set $k=1+\|u\|_{p}^{-p}\left(\text { for }\|u\|_{p} \leq \infty\right)$. Let $B_{x}$ denote the unitary ball in $\mathbb{R}^N$ centered at $x$ with $\beta_x$ the characteristic function. Clearly there is some $x$ such that \begin{equation}\label{lb}\int|\nabla u|^{p} \beta_{x}<k \int|u|^{p} \beta_{x}.\end{equation}

I can't see why the inequality \eqref{lb} above is true.

In the Lieb's paper "On the lowest eigenvalue of the Laplacian for the intersection of two domains" we found the following remark: Let $u\in L_{loc}^p(\mathbb{R}^N)$ $\nabla u \in L^{p}$ and $\|\nabla u\|_{p} \leq 1 .$ Set $k=1+\|u\|_{p}^{-p}\left(\text { for }\|u\|_{p} \leq \infty\right)$. Let $B_{x}$ denote the unitary ball in $\mathbb{R}^N$ centered at $x$ with $\beta_x$ the characteristic function. Clearly there is some $x$ such that \begin{equation}\label{lb}\int|\nabla u|^{p} \beta_{x}<k \int|u|^{p} \beta_{x}.\end{equation}

I can't see why the inequality \eqref{lb} above is true.

Source Link

Poincaré-type Inequality

In the Lieb's paper "On the lowest eigenvalue of the Laplacian for the intersection of two domains" we found the following remark: Let $u\in L_{loc}^1(\mathbb{R}^N)$ $\nabla u \in L^{p}$ and $\|\nabla u\|_{p} \leq 1 .$ Set $k=1+\|u\|_{p}^{-p}\left(\text { for }\|u\|_{p} \leq \infty\right)$. Let $B_{x}$ denote the unitary ball in $\mathbb{R}^N$ centered at $x$ with $\beta_x$ the characteristic function. Clearly there is some $x$ such that \begin{equation}\label{lb}\int|\nabla u|^{p} \beta_{x}<k \int|u|^{p} \beta_{x}.\end{equation}

I can't see why the inequality \eqref{lb} above is true.