Skip to main content
Update the current state of the question
Source Link

Is the following true? Given a first countable Hausdorff space $X$ and a dense subset $Y\subset X$ which is initially $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf in $X$. Let $F$ be a subset of $Y$ such that $\vert F\vert\leq 2^{\omega }$. Then $\big\vert \overline{F} \big\vert \leq 2^\omega $.

I actually want to prove something stronger, namely that $Y$ is Lindelöf in $X$. The proof goes by transfinite induction on $\alpha<\aleph_1$, one of the steps require the above statement to be true, so maybe some of the hypothesis above are not needed for that particular statement.

By Lindelöf in $X$, I mean that for any open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset\gamma $ that covers $Y$. By $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf I mean that for every open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ with $\vert \gamma \vert\leq 2^\omega$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset \gamma $ that covers $Y$.

This question has been cross-posted and answered in MathStackExchange Here is the link.

Is the following true? Given a first countable Hausdorff space $X$ and a dense subset $Y\subset X$ which is initially $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf in $X$. Let $F$ be a subset of $Y$ such that $\vert F\vert\leq 2^{\omega }$. Then $\big\vert \overline{F} \big\vert \leq 2^\omega $.

I actually want to prove something stronger, namely that $Y$ is Lindelöf in $X$. The proof goes by transfinite induction on $\alpha<\aleph_1$, one of the steps require the above statement to be true, so maybe some of the hypothesis above are not needed for that particular statement.

By Lindelöf in $X$, I mean that for any open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset\gamma $ that covers $Y$. By $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf I mean that for every open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ with $\vert \gamma \vert\leq 2^\omega$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset \gamma $ that covers $Y$.

Is the following true? Given a first countable Hausdorff space $X$ and a dense subset $Y\subset X$ which is initially $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf in $X$. Let $F$ be a subset of $Y$ such that $\vert F\vert\leq 2^{\omega }$. Then $\big\vert \overline{F} \big\vert \leq 2^\omega $.

I actually want to prove something stronger, namely that $Y$ is Lindelöf in $X$. The proof goes by transfinite induction on $\alpha<\aleph_1$, one of the steps require the above statement to be true, so maybe some of the hypothesis above are not needed for that particular statement.

By Lindelöf in $X$, I mean that for any open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset\gamma $ that covers $Y$. By $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf I mean that for every open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ with $\vert \gamma \vert\leq 2^\omega$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset \gamma $ that covers $Y$.

This question has been cross-posted and answered in MathStackExchange Here is the link.

formatting
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Cardinality of the closure of subset of a dense setsubset

Is the following true? Given a first countable Hausdorff space $X$ and a dense subset $Y\subset X$ which is initially $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf in $X$. Let $F$ be a subset of $Y$ such that $\vert F\vert\leq 2^{\omega }$, then. Then $\vert \overline{F} \vert \leq 2^\omega $$\big\vert \overline{F} \big\vert \leq 2^\omega $.

I actually want to prove something stronger, namely that $Y$ is Lindelöf in $X$. The proof goes by transfinite induction on $\alpha<\aleph_1$, one of the steps require the above statement to be true, so maybe some of the hypothesis above are not needed for that particular statement. Also by

By Lindelöf in $X$, I mean that for any open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset\gamma $ that covers $Y$. By $2^\omega-$$2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf I mean that for every open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ with $\vert \gamma \vert\leq 2^\omega$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset \gamma $ that covers $Y$.

Cardinality of the closure of subset of a dense set

Is the following true? Given a first countable Hausdorff space $X$ and a dense subset $Y\subset X$ which is initially $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf in $X$. Let $F$ be a subset of $Y$ such that $\vert F\vert\leq 2^{\omega }$, then $\vert \overline{F} \vert \leq 2^\omega $.

I actually want to prove something stronger, namely that $Y$ is Lindelöf in $X$. The proof goes by transfinite induction on $\alpha<\aleph_1$, one of the steps require the above statement to be true, so maybe some of the hypothesis above are not needed for that particular statement. Also by Lindelöf in $X$ I mean that for any open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset\gamma $ that covers $Y$. By $2^\omega-$initially Lindelöf I mean that for every open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ with $\vert \gamma \vert\leq 2^\omega$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset \gamma $ that covers $Y$

Cardinality of the closure of subset of a dense subset

Is the following true? Given a first countable Hausdorff space $X$ and a dense subset $Y\subset X$ which is initially $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf in $X$. Let $F$ be a subset of $Y$ such that $\vert F\vert\leq 2^{\omega }$. Then $\big\vert \overline{F} \big\vert \leq 2^\omega $.

I actually want to prove something stronger, namely that $Y$ is Lindelöf in $X$. The proof goes by transfinite induction on $\alpha<\aleph_1$, one of the steps require the above statement to be true, so maybe some of the hypothesis above are not needed for that particular statement.

By Lindelöf in $X$, I mean that for any open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset\gamma $ that covers $Y$. By $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf I mean that for every open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ with $\vert \gamma \vert\leq 2^\omega$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset \gamma $ that covers $Y$.

added 10 characters in body
Source Link

Is the following true? Given a first countable Hausdorff space $X$ and a dense subset $Y\subset X$ which is initially $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf in $X$. Let $F$ be a subset of $Y$ such that $\vert F\vert\leq 2^{\omega }$, then $\vert \overline{F} \vert \leq 2^\omega $.

I actually want to prove something stronger, namely that $Y$ is Lindelöf in $X$. The proof goes by transfinite induction on $\alpha<\aleph_1$, one of the steps require the above statement to be true, so maybe some of the hypothesis above are not needed for that particular statement. Also by Lindelöf in $X$ I mean that for any open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset\gamma $ that covers $Y$. By $2^\omega-$initially Lindelöf I mean that for every open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ with $\vert \gamma \vert\leq 2^\omega$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset \gamma $ that covers $Y$

Is the following true? Given a first countable Hausdorff space $X$ and a dense subset $Y\subset X$ which is initially $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf in $X$. Let $F$ be a subset of $Y$ such that $\vert F\vert\leq 2^{\omega }$, then $\vert \overline{F} \vert \leq 2^\omega $.

I actually want to prove something stronger, namely that $Y$ is Lindelöf in $X$. The proof goes by transfinite induction on $\alpha<\aleph_1$, one of the steps require the above statement to be true, so maybe some of the hypothesis above are not needed for that particular statement. Also by Lindelöf in $X$ I mean that for any open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset\gamma $ that covers $Y$. By $2^\omega-$initially Lindelöf I mean that for every open cover $\gamma$ of $\vert \gamma \vert\leq 2^\omega$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset \gamma $ that covers $Y$

Is the following true? Given a first countable Hausdorff space $X$ and a dense subset $Y\subset X$ which is initially $2^\omega$-initially Lindelöf in $X$. Let $F$ be a subset of $Y$ such that $\vert F\vert\leq 2^{\omega }$, then $\vert \overline{F} \vert \leq 2^\omega $.

I actually want to prove something stronger, namely that $Y$ is Lindelöf in $X$. The proof goes by transfinite induction on $\alpha<\aleph_1$, one of the steps require the above statement to be true, so maybe some of the hypothesis above are not needed for that particular statement. Also by Lindelöf in $X$ I mean that for any open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset\gamma $ that covers $Y$. By $2^\omega-$initially Lindelöf I mean that for every open cover $\gamma$ of $X$ with $\vert \gamma \vert\leq 2^\omega$ there exists a countable subfamily $\eta\subset \gamma $ that covers $Y$

Source Link
Loading