Timeline for Does the category of local rings with residue field $F$ have an initial object?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2021 at 12:12 | vote | accept | The Thin Whistler | ||
| May 15, 2020 at 15:56 | vote | accept | The Thin Whistler | ||
| May 18, 2020 at 11:29 | |||||
| May 15, 2020 at 15:53 | vote | accept | The Thin Whistler | ||
| May 15, 2020 at 15:56 | |||||
| May 15, 2020 at 15:53 | vote | accept | The Thin Whistler | ||
| May 15, 2020 at 15:53 | |||||
| May 15, 2020 at 15:38 | answer | added | user158035 | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 15, 2020 at 13:19 | vote | accept | The Thin Whistler | ||
| May 15, 2020 at 14:15 | |||||
| May 15, 2020 at 13:14 | answer | added | Simon Henry | timeline score: 12 | |
| May 15, 2020 at 13:03 | comment | added | YCor | But I'm unsure what you mean by "finite type". Probably "finitely generated field" is more clear, or "finite field or number field" if you really mean finite type (= finitely generated ring) | |
| May 15, 2020 at 13:02 | comment | added | The Thin Whistler | @YCor thanks, fixed that. | |
| May 15, 2020 at 13:00 | history | edited | The Thin Whistler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 79 characters in body
|
| May 15, 2020 at 12:58 | comment | added | YCor | I guess that "$F$ of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$" should be "$F$ is a finitely generated field"? as formulated now it looks like it's a field that is a finitely generated $\mathbf{Z}$-algebra, but this would then be a finite field. Still a first interesting case is that of non-prime finite fields. | |
| May 15, 2020 at 12:46 | history | asked | The Thin Whistler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |