Timeline for A question about the dispersion points of connected metric spaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2016 at 20:15 | vote | accept | Garabed Gulbenkian | ||
| S May 1, 2016 at 7:46 | history | suggested | Amir Sagiv | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
latex and tag
|
| May 1, 2016 at 7:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 1, 2016 at 7:46 | |||||
| Apr 30, 2016 at 18:56 | answer | added | Forever Mozart | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 10, 2010 at 7:39 | answer | added | Rachid Atmai | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 19, 2010 at 8:07 | comment | added | Dror Atariah | @alephomega: I believe the answer is yes. For if $B\subset C$ and contains more then one point, but $p\notin B$, then when removing $p$ we still have $B\subset C\setminus\{p\}$, and $B$ is still connected, which is a contradiction to the totally disconnectedness of $C\setminus \{p\}$. | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 23:15 | comment | added | Rachid Atmai | I have a question: if C becomes totally disconnected when the point p is removed, does it necessarily mean that every connected component of C has to include p? Thx for clarifying. | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 19:18 | history | asked | Garabed Gulbenkian | CC BY-SA 2.5 |