Timeline for How to cite a MathSciNet review
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 12, 2020 at 19:02 | comment | added | Charles | @Gro-Tsen Perhaps a really extensive one would be! 😁 | |
May 10, 2020 at 14:45 | comment | added | Gro-Tsen | Wait, if Math Reviews is a journal like any other, why aren't Math Reviews reviewed by Math Reviews? 😂 | |
May 10, 2020 at 0:10 | history | became hot network question | |||
May 9, 2020 at 22:07 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
May 9, 2020 at 20:13 | vote | accept | R W | ||
May 9, 2020 at 19:54 | answer | added | Edward Dunne | timeline score: 7 | |
May 9, 2020 at 19:43 | comment | added | Francois Ziegler | You can actually search Mathematical Reviews for itself (the phrase) in References and find hundreds of hits — e.g. one of the earliest being ref.3 of this paper. | |
May 9, 2020 at 19:40 | answer | added | Dmitri Pavlov | timeline score: 5 | |
May 9, 2020 at 19:10 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: -2 | |
May 9, 2020 at 17:11 | comment | added | R W | @Joe Silverman Sure - of course I want to include the MR identifier, the names, etc. My question is rather about a template for the whole reference. | |
May 9, 2020 at 16:59 | comment | added | Joe Silverman | At this point, I believe that every entry in MathSciNet has a unique MR identifier for the form MR#######, so that should certainly be included. But it's not clear if the reference should be sorted by the auhor of the article or the author of the review. I would tend to say the latter, since that's who wrote the material, but I'm sure others would disagree. In any case, both names should be listed, making it clear who wrote what. | |
May 9, 2020 at 16:31 | comment | added | Najib Idrissi | It's a journal like any other, I would cite it as: A. Uthor (of the review). "Title of the article." Mathematical Reviews (20XX). link-to-the-review. I don't think they publish volumes or that reviews have page numbers anymore so it's a bit bare bones, of course. | |
May 9, 2020 at 16:07 | history | asked | R W | CC BY-SA 4.0 |