Timeline for A tree with prime vertices
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2020 at 2:35 | comment | added | Sungjin Kim | @ChuaKS Please see my modified answer. The extended rule for edges is allowing to connect any $p,q$ satisfying the configuration. However, It still needs long way to go. | |
| May 11, 2020 at 21:04 | history | undeleted | Sungjin Kim | ||
| May 11, 2020 at 21:03 | history | edited | Sungjin Kim | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 420 characters in body
|
| May 10, 2020 at 23:43 | history | deleted | Sungjin Kim | via Vote | |
| May 10, 2020 at 23:43 | history | edited | Sungjin Kim | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 39 characters in body
|
| May 9, 2020 at 20:16 | comment | added | user156885 | I see, thank you | |
| May 9, 2020 at 19:00 | comment | added | Sungjin Kim | As my approach is finding smaller prime $p$ using the solution to the equation (Conjecture 1), the Nonexistence of such solution $p$ does not rule out the possibility of being connected to primes larger than $q$. For example, see 37, 67, 101, etc in Joseph's tree. | |
| May 9, 2020 at 15:34 | comment | added | user156885 | How about For the converse, by contrapositive If no solution to the equation with prime variables then we get an isolated point | |
| May 9, 2020 at 13:26 | comment | added | Sungjin Kim | Not completely sure, but I think the statement about equations in primes is stronger statement than being able to connect all primes. | |
| May 9, 2020 at 13:24 | comment | added | user156885 | Nice, the converse to this also holds? So this problem is equivalent to a statement about equations in primes? | |
| May 9, 2020 at 13:13 | history | answered | Sungjin Kim | CC BY-SA 4.0 |