Skip to main content
added 81 characters in body
Source Link

I am now interested in shifted symplectic structures.

I found Zhang's results about symplectic structures (2011, p.3-4, arXiv link, Comm. Anal. Geom. 2017) and Pantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi's results on shifted symplectic structures (2011, see p.1-2, arXiv link, Publ. IHES 2013).

I thought Zhang's results were completely included in the results of Pantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi. Is this idea correct? (About the reason of asking the question, see my comment below)

Any comment welcome! Thank you.

I am now interested in shifted symplectic structures.

I found Zhang's results about symplectic structures (2011, p.3-4, arXiv link, Comm. Anal. Geom. 2017) and Pantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi's results on shifted symplectic structures (2011, see p.1-2, arXiv link, Publ. IHES 2013).

I thought were completely included in the results of Pantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi. Is this idea correct?

Any comment welcome! Thank you.

I am now interested in shifted symplectic structures.

I found Zhang's results about symplectic structures (2011, p.3-4, arXiv link, Comm. Anal. Geom. 2017) and Pantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi's results on shifted symplectic structures (2011, see p.1-2, arXiv link, Publ. IHES 2013).

I thought Zhang's results were completely included in the results of Pantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi. Is this idea correct? (About the reason of asking the question, see my comment below)

Any comment welcome! Thank you.

edited title
Link

Two results about (shifted) symplectic structures

added reference info, formatting
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

I am now interested in shifted symplectic structures.

And, I found Zhang's results about symplectic structures  (2011, p.3-4, http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.6294v1arXiv link, Comm. Anal. Geom. 2017) and Pantev et al.'SPantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi's results on shifted symplectic structures  (2011, see p.1-2, http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3209v4arXiv link, Publ. IHES 2013).

I thought were completely included in the results of Pantev et alPantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi. Is this idea correct?

Any comment welcome! Thank you.

Edit: Zhang's results -> In page 3~4 of his paper

Pantev et al.'S results -> In page 1~2 of their paper

I am now interested in shifted symplectic structures.

And, I found Zhang's results about symplectic structures(http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.6294v1) and Pantev et al.'S results on shifted symplectic structures(http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3209v4).

I thought were completely included in the results of Pantev et al. Is this idea correct?

Any comment welcome! Thank you.

Edit: Zhang's results -> In page 3~4 of his paper

Pantev et al.'S results -> In page 1~2 of their paper

I am now interested in shifted symplectic structures.

I found Zhang's results about symplectic structures  (2011, p.3-4, arXiv link, Comm. Anal. Geom. 2017) and Pantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi's results on shifted symplectic structures  (2011, see p.1-2, arXiv link, Publ. IHES 2013).

I thought were completely included in the results of Pantev–Toen–Vaquié–Vezzosi. Is this idea correct?

Any comment welcome! Thank you.

Source Link
Loading