Timeline for Does Weyl's Inequality prove equidistribution?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2010 at 13:09 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | I have turned this into a tricky article, see tricki.org/article/… | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 11:18 | vote | accept | David E Speyer | ||
| Aug 18, 2010 at 11:18 | vote | accept | David E Speyer | ||
| Aug 18, 2010 at 11:18 | |||||
| Aug 18, 2010 at 11:17 | comment | added | David E Speyer | That's really slick! Now to think about whether I can push it to handle the math.SE question... | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 10:30 | comment | added | George Lowther | Sorry, wasn't very clear there. I meant, for each N it uniformly bounds $\{S^t_N\colon t\in\mathbb{R}\}$. | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 10:24 | comment | added | George Lowther | +1 fantastic! This looks good to me. Weyl's inequality only refers to the degree of f and its leading coefficient, which are the same for all translates of f. So it uniformly bounds all $S^t_N$. | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 9:35 | history | answered | Benoît Kloeckner | CC BY-SA 2.5 |