Timeline for Classification of symplectic resolutions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 13, 2020 at 23:32 | vote | accept | Yellow Pig | ||
May 13, 2020 at 23:32 | vote | accept | Yellow Pig | ||
May 13, 2020 at 23:32 | |||||
May 12, 2020 at 2:16 | comment | added | Hiraku Nakajima | On 3), I do not think that this is a well-defined question unless one specify what `explicit descriptions' means. Besides mathematically proved statements, Hanany and his collaborators identify many Coulomb branches with nilpotent orbits and Slodowy slices. | |
May 12, 2020 at 2:09 | comment | added | Hiraku Nakajima | (cont'd.) In Lemma 6.9 in arxiv.org/pdf/1601.03586.pdf, it was shown that only type A,D simple singularities appear in the two dimensional case. Therefore type E simple singularities do not appear as a Coulomb branch. Since minimal nilpotent orbits and simple singularities are believed to be symplectic dual, this is compatible with the belief above. | |
May 12, 2020 at 2:07 | comment | added | Hiraku Nakajima | On 2), Coulomb branch is conical with respect to a certain standard choice of $\mathbb C^\times$-action if and only if the gauge theory is good or ugly. See e.g, Section 3 of arxiv.org/pdf/1510.03908.pdf. There is a belief that instanton moduli spaces for exceptional groups (e.g., minimal nilpotent orbits for exceptional groups) cannot be realized as a hamiltonian reduction of a symplectic vector space. | |
May 4, 2020 at 13:49 | vote | accept | Yellow Pig | ||
May 13, 2020 at 23:32 | |||||
May 1, 2020 at 19:06 | history | answered | Yellow Pig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |