Timeline for Results that are widely accepted but no proof has appeared
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2020 at 16:32 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | @TimothyChow Sorry. It is a typo.. I am not looking for "readily available but not formally published". | |
| Apr 15, 2020 at 16:22 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | @PraphullaKoushik : You are? Or is that a typo? In most of the other answers, the proof is not readily available. | |
| Apr 15, 2020 at 13:31 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | It is not clear how to respond to this answer... As mentioned by Timothy Chow, I am looking for "readily available but not formally published"... Thanks for your answer :) | |
| Apr 15, 2020 at 13:21 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | Your answer highlights the distinction between "publicly available" and "published." My interpretation was that the proof needed to be unavailable, not just unpublished, but reading the question carefully, I see that it is ambivalent. Probably there are many more examples if "readily available but not formally published" counts. | |
| S Apr 15, 2020 at 12:57 | history | answered | Per Alexandersson | CC BY-SA 4.0 | |
| S Apr 15, 2020 at 12:57 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Per Alexandersson |