Timeline for Fredholm transversality
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2020 at 21:25 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @ThomasRot I realy thank you very much for this very instructive and interesting paper. | |
| Apr 12, 2020 at 13:19 | comment | added | Thomas Rot | You might be interested in this paper: arxiv.org/pdf/math/0309020.pdf | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 14:49 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 11, 2020 at 14:48 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @ThomasRot Ah yes yes. I am sorry. I revise it. Thank you very much for your comment! | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 8:47 | comment | added | Thomas Rot | Otherwise the condition is that Df has finite rank | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 8:21 | comment | added | Thomas Rot | Shouldn't $(Df_x(T_x M), T_{f(x)} N)$ be $(Df_x(T_x M), T_{f(x)} P)$? | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 8:03 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @ThomasRot Why do you think that there is a typo? | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 8:03 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | Quote from the paper:"We recall that a Fredholm pair is a pair of closed subspaces (V,W) such that V +W is closed and finite codimensional, V ∩W is finite dimensional" | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 8:01 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @ThomasRot I think it is identical to what the libked paper originally wrote. | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 7:37 | comment | added | Thomas Rot | I think there is a typo in the definition of the pair. | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 4:48 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 11, 2020 at 4:18 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 11, 2020 at 3:20 | history | asked | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |