Timeline for Note rejected from arXiv: what to do next?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2020 at 22:09 | comment | added | Hollis Williams | Also Einstein's original 1905 paper on special relativity contains no references at all, I don't think you could get away with that these days. | |
| Apr 12, 2020 at 19:24 | comment | added | Hollis Williams | There are short papers by Jacobi for example which would be rejected if you tried to submit them to ArXiv now. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 20:01 | comment | added | Kostya_I | Times change. For example, Quillen's "Determinants of Cauchy-Riemann operators over a Riemann surface" (which contains exactly one reference) and perhaps many other classical work would be desk-rejected and arXiv-moderated nowadays. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 18:18 | history | edited | Nate Eldredge | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 96 characters in body
|
| Apr 10, 2020 at 18:09 | history | edited | Nate Eldredge | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 96 characters in body
|
| Apr 10, 2020 at 18:09 | comment | added | paul garrett | Yes, the lack of references (except to yourself?) and lack of contact info or institutional affiliation would make many editors and referees reject the thing immediately... | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 18:03 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Apr 10, 2020 at 18:00 | history | answered | Nate Eldredge | CC BY-SA 4.0 |