Timeline for Morphisms of two fully reducible representations of a group
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2020 at 8:02 | history | edited | Bugs Bunny | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1084 characters in body
|
| Apr 11, 2020 at 7:56 | history | edited | Bugs Bunny | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1084 characters in body
|
| Apr 10, 2020 at 17:59 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor TeX fixes
|
| Apr 10, 2020 at 17:51 | comment | added | LSpice | I think, in the SO spirit of kindness and friendliness, your first sentence would be just as clear as "Doc, your language is older and I find it confusing. I suggest the following modern equivalent: …." For what it's worth, I am a living being and found it perfectly clear (although, as you mention, missing hypotheses). | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 17:28 | comment | added | Michael_1812 | I have now corrected Q1, by mentioning that A is irreducible. Would it be in your power to shape your answer to Q1 in simple words available to a layman physicist? We peasants are not taught canonical decomposition, etc. But at times we still need some knowledge of this area, as users. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 17:25 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| Apr 10, 2020 at 16:55 | comment | added | Michael_1812 | Thank you for your response - and pls be generous: I am a physicist, not a pure mathematician. Hence my archaic language. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 16:26 | history | answered | Bugs Bunny | CC BY-SA 4.0 |