Timeline for Note rejected from arXiv: what to do next?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2022 at 3:12 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | So, in the end, what did you decide to do, Gro-Tsen? | |
| Apr 21, 2022 at 9:53 | comment | added | Gro-Tsen | @lynvie: No, the version on HAL is the only form I “published” (note: full text link is under the “files” heading at the top right, many people found this confusing). | |
| Apr 21, 2022 at 2:03 | comment | added | lynvie | Did you ever post it somewhere else? | |
| Aug 3, 2020 at 11:38 | answer | added | Hans-Peter Stricker | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 12, 2020 at 19:38 | answer | added | Hollis Williams | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 12, 2020 at 19:25 | comment | added | Hollis Williams | ArXiv has to have some form of moderation, obviously you could otherwise literally upload anything. | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 19:54 | comment | added | Taras Banakh | You can post your notes to the ResearchGate (researchgate.net). The submitted texts appear on RG immediately without any moderation. | |
| Apr 11, 2020 at 14:04 | answer | added | user21349 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 23:37 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 10, 2020 at 20:48 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | Are you sure this appeal is worth your time? Can't you just ignore it, publish the note on your webpage and/or submit it to a refereed journal? | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 20:05 | history | edited | Gro-Tsen |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 10, 2020 at 18:03 | comment | added | LSpice | @AlexandreEremenko, re your comment: direct link to the paper. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 18:03 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Apr 10, 2020 at 18:00 | answer | added | Nate Eldredge | timeline score: 42 | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 16:26 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | @AlexandreEremenko In the top-right corner of the HAL page, see "FILES". | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 16:23 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | It is also new (and surprising) for me to learn that arXiv has moderators who reject papers. Your link "a note on the subject" shows only the abstract, but not the complete text. Is there a place where I can see the complete text? Just curious, what kind of paper arXiv can reject. Speaking of an advice, I would do the following a) try to correspond with arXiv and ask them for an explanation, using the same address from which they sent you the rejection note. b) publish your paper elsewhere, in a journal, or some other preprint server. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 16:12 | comment | added | Nemo | vixra.org was designed specifically to adress exactly this issue. Also what I want to add. It seems your paper has only one reference. This would seem suspicious to anyone. I suggest you to study the literature and add other references. I doubt there can not be other references relevant to this problem. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 16:07 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 82 | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:57 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | My understanding is that if a paper is deemed inappropriate for a certain arXiv category, often it gets "bumped" to another category ("general mathematics" being a common category to be bumped to) and will still be posted. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:54 | comment | added | GTA | You might need to change the subject. There are certainly subtle boundaries for a subject which is not fully described by its subject name | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:52 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | A wild guess as to what happened: there is a strong push to prevent the online spread of "misinformation" related to the current pandemic- e.g., commercial websites like YouTube/Facebook/etc. have been blocking or removing content for this reason. Maybe the arXiv moderators got caught up in this movement as well and decided to be extra (apparently overly) cautious with regards to epidemiological modeling. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:48 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | Greg Kuperberg is a MathOverflow user (although not very active as of late) and IIRC has a high-up position in the arXiv hierarchy, maybe like overall head of mathematics. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:41 | comment | added | Gro-Tsen | Maybe I should dump the content on Wikipedia, and if someone tries to remove it as “original research” I can point out that the arXiv moderators told me that contained no original research. 🤡 | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:35 | history | asked | Gro-Tsen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |