Skip to main content
typo in formula
Source Link
Zach Teitler
  • 6.2k
  • 3
  • 33
  • 63

I just encountered a very curious relation in an algebra. A bit simplified, I am working in a (particular) non-commutative algebra, with some relations.

One particular relation is the following: For (some particular choices of) elements $a,b,c,x,y,z$ in the algebra, the relation is of the form $bz+cz+ay = az+bx+cy$$bz+cx+ay = az+bx+cy$. This can be stated as a vanishing 3x3-determinant,

$$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$

We can think of $a,...,z$ as words, and multiplication is simply concatenation. Has this type of relation been observed/used in some algebras before? Does it fit into some larger picture?

In my concrete case, this relation does not hold in general, but only for certain particular combinations of $a,b,c,x,y,z$, so examples where there are some restrictions on when the relation applies are also interesting to me.

I just encountered a very curious relation in an algebra. A bit simplified, I am working in a (particular) non-commutative algebra, with some relations.

One particular relation is the following: For (some particular choices of) elements $a,b,c,x,y,z$ in the algebra, the relation is of the form $bz+cz+ay = az+bx+cy$. This can be stated as a vanishing 3x3-determinant,

$$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$

We can think of $a,...,z$ as words, and multiplication is simply concatenation. Has this type of relation been observed/used in some algebras before? Does it fit into some larger picture?

In my concrete case, this relation does not hold in general, but only for certain particular combinations of $a,b,c,x,y,z$, so examples where there are some restrictions on when the relation applies are also interesting to me.

I just encountered a very curious relation in an algebra. A bit simplified, I am working in a (particular) non-commutative algebra, with some relations.

One particular relation is the following: For (some particular choices of) elements $a,b,c,x,y,z$ in the algebra, the relation is of the form $bz+cx+ay = az+bx+cy$. This can be stated as a vanishing 3x3-determinant,

$$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$

We can think of $a,...,z$ as words, and multiplication is simply concatenation. Has this type of relation been observed/used in some algebras before? Does it fit into some larger picture?

In my concrete case, this relation does not hold in general, but only for certain particular combinations of $a,b,c,x,y,z$, so examples where there are some restrictions on when the relation applies are also interesting to me.

clarified
Source Link
Per Alexandersson
  • 15.8k
  • 10
  • 74
  • 133

I just encountered a very curious relation in an algebra. A A bit simplified, the relation states that for expressions $a,b,c,x,y,z$I am working in the free algebra $\mathbb{Q}\langle X \rangle$ over somea (nonparticular) non-commutative!) alphabet $X$ algebra, with some relations.

One particular relation is the following: we haveFor (some particular choices of) $$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$elements $a,b,c,x,y,z$ in the algebra, Thatthe relation is, of the form $bz+cz+ay = az+bx+cy$. This can be stated as a vanishing 3x3-determinant,

$$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$

We can think of $a,...,z$ as words, and multiplication is simply concatenation. Has this type of relation been observed in some algebras beforeHas this type of relation been observed/used in some algebras before? Does it fit into some larger picture?

In my concrete case, this relation does not hold in general, but only for certain particular combinations of $a,b,c,x,y,z$, so examples where there are some restrictions on when the relation applies are also interesting to me.

I just encountered a very curious relation in an algebra. A bit simplified, the relation states that for expressions $a,b,c,x,y,z$ in the free algebra $\mathbb{Q}\langle X \rangle$ over some (non-commutative!) alphabet $X$, we have $$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$ That is, $bz+cz+ay = az+bx+cy$.

We can think of $a,...,z$ as words, and multiplication is simply concatenation. Has this type of relation been observed in some algebras before? Does it fit into some larger picture?

In my concrete case, this relation does not hold in general, but only for certain particular combinations of $a,b,c,x,y,z$, so examples where there are some restrictions on when the relation applies are also interesting to me.

I just encountered a very curious relation in an algebra. A bit simplified, I am working in a (particular) non-commutative algebra, with some relations.

One particular relation is the following: For (some particular choices of) elements $a,b,c,x,y,z$ in the algebra, the relation is of the form $bz+cz+ay = az+bx+cy$. This can be stated as a vanishing 3x3-determinant,

$$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$

We can think of $a,...,z$ as words, and multiplication is simply concatenation. Has this type of relation been observed/used in some algebras before? Does it fit into some larger picture?

In my concrete case, this relation does not hold in general, but only for certain particular combinations of $a,b,c,x,y,z$, so examples where there are some restrictions on when the relation applies are also interesting to me.

added 14 characters in body
Source Link
Per Alexandersson
  • 15.8k
  • 10
  • 74
  • 133

I just encountered a very curious relation in an algebra. A bit simplified, the relation states that for expressions $a,b,c,x,y,z$ in the free algebra $\mathbb{Q}[X]$$\mathbb{Q}\langle X \rangle$ over some (non-commutative!) alphabet $X$, we have $$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$ That is, $bz+cz+ay = az+bx+cy$.

We can think of $a,...,z$ as words, and multiplication is simply concatenation. Has this type of relation been observed in some algebras before? Does it fit into some larger picture?

In my concrete case, this relation does not hold in general, but only for certain particular combinations of $a,b,c,x,y,z$, so examples where there are some restrictions on when the relation applies are also interesting to me.

I just encountered a very curious relation in an algebra. A bit simplified, the relation states that for expressions $a,b,c,x,y,z$ in the free algebra $\mathbb{Q}[X]$ over some (non-commutative!) alphabet $X$, we have $$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$ That is, $bz+cz+ay = az+bx+cy$.

We can think of $a,...,z$ as words, and multiplication is simply concatenation. Has this type of relation been observed in some algebras before? Does it fit into some larger picture?

In my concrete case, this relation does not hold in general, but only for certain particular combinations of $a,b,c,x,y,z$, so examples where there are some restrictions on when the relation applies are also interesting to me.

I just encountered a very curious relation in an algebra. A bit simplified, the relation states that for expressions $a,b,c,x,y,z$ in the free algebra $\mathbb{Q}\langle X \rangle$ over some (non-commutative!) alphabet $X$, we have $$ \begin{vmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix}=0. $$ That is, $bz+cz+ay = az+bx+cy$.

We can think of $a,...,z$ as words, and multiplication is simply concatenation. Has this type of relation been observed in some algebras before? Does it fit into some larger picture?

In my concrete case, this relation does not hold in general, but only for certain particular combinations of $a,b,c,x,y,z$, so examples where there are some restrictions on when the relation applies are also interesting to me.

Source Link
Per Alexandersson
  • 15.8k
  • 10
  • 74
  • 133
Loading