Timeline for Terminology: "sufficiently large absolute constant"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2020 at 9:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 14, 2020 at 3:05 | |||||
| Apr 6, 2020 at 13:07 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | Any random variable $\xi$ ? No. Any random variable $\xi$ as specified in Theorem 1.3. If $\xi \in L^2$, then it hods for $C_0=2$ by definition of $L^2$. Presumably the random variables in Theorem 1.3 need not be in $L^2$, so he has to use a larger constant $C_0$. Perhaps they state it that way because they do not actually compute the constant $C_0$ that works, they only prove that one exists. | |
| Apr 6, 2020 at 12:41 | vote | accept | ABIM | ||
| Apr 6, 2020 at 12:35 | comment | added | YCor | "Absolute constant" usually means it does not depend on any of the fixed data. | |
| Apr 6, 2020 at 12:34 | answer | added | Alexandre Eremenko | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 6, 2020 at 12:34 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed capitals
|
| Apr 6, 2020 at 11:46 | comment | added | ABIM | So it holds for any $\xi$ random variables in $L^2$? | |
| Apr 6, 2020 at 11:41 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 6, 2020 at 11:20 | history | asked | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |