Timeline for Interpretation of the action in classical mechanics
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2020 at 11:03 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarify
|
| Apr 6, 2020 at 4:17 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix sign error
|
| Apr 5, 2020 at 22:09 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 938 characters in body
|
| Apr 5, 2020 at 14:47 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 241 characters in body
|
| Apr 5, 2020 at 13:44 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Apr 5, 2020 at 13:42 | comment | added | Michael Engelhardt | Indeed, there is nothing particularly fundamental about the combination (kinetic-potential) energy. This is what the Lagrangean happens to be if the kinetic energy happens to be quadratic in $p$. In general, e.g., for a relativistic particle, the Lagrangean doesn't have the (kinetic-potential) energy form. | |
| Apr 5, 2020 at 13:42 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Avoid notational collision
|
| Apr 5, 2020 at 13:34 | history | answered | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |