Skip to main content

Timeline for Blocking set in a projective plane.

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 15, 2010 at 19:44 history edited Andreas Thom
edited tags
Aug 14, 2010 at 22:55 comment added damiano If you do not mind, I would edit the question to make it self-contained as follows. Let $\mathbb{P}$ be the set of points of the projective plane over a finite field with q elements. A blocking set in $\mathbb{P}$ is a subset $S \subset \mathbb{P}$ such that $S$ contains no line and every line in $\mathbb{P}$ has at least one point in common with $S$. Let $A$ be a subset of $\mathbb{P}$ and suppose that for every blocking set $S$ we have $A \cap S \neq \emptyset$. Question: is it true that $|A| \geq q+1$, and that if equality holds, then $A$ is a line?
Aug 14, 2010 at 19:29 vote accept jeff
Aug 14, 2010 at 16:00 answer added damiano timeline score: 2
Aug 14, 2010 at 14:50 comment added jeff OK, i've edited my original post to the words of damiano as this is exactly what i mean :) Sorry for the trouble.
Aug 14, 2010 at 14:49 history edited jeff CC BY-SA 2.5
added 33 characters in body
Aug 14, 2010 at 14:30 comment added Gerry Myerson @jeff, blocking set is the right term, what has confused everyone is that you defined a blocking set to be a set that doesn't contain a line, when what you meant is what you said in your last comment. I suggest you withdraw your question and re-enter it the way it should be.
Aug 14, 2010 at 14:28 comment added damiano I see: a blocking set is a subset $S$ of the projective plane with the property that every line has at least one point in common with $S$. You require such a blocking set to not contain any line, and then you want to ask the question about $A$, ranging over all non-trivial blocking sets. Is this a correct interpretation? The wording in your question is quite difficult to parse, for someone not familiar with the notion of a blocking set.
Aug 14, 2010 at 14:25 comment added jeff So in my question: S = ANY of these sets such that there is no line in them
Aug 14, 2010 at 14:23 comment added jeff Then i suppose i'm using the wrong term for blocking set. What i mean is: Set of points such that each line from the projective plane consists at least one of these points.
Aug 14, 2010 at 14:13 comment added jeff I've mentioned that for each blocking set S that doesn't contain a line, and according to Bruen, |S| >= q + sqrt(q) + 1 so how what singeltons have to do here? So i want A to intersect every blocking set S that doesn't contain a line.
Aug 14, 2010 at 13:48 comment added jeff I'm sorry, the definition is for ANY blocking set S, therefore you cannot take a concrete one.
Aug 14, 2010 at 13:30 comment added jeff p contains a line so it cannot be a blocking set.
Aug 14, 2010 at 10:33 history asked jeff CC BY-SA 2.5