Timeline for Sobolev topology on essentially compactly supported Sobolev-"functions"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2020 at 20:31 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Mar 25, 2020 at 15:26 | vote | accept | ABIM | ||
| Mar 25, 2020 at 15:26 | answer | added | Jochen Wengenroth | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 25, 2020 at 15:25 | comment | added | ABIM | Oh my brain filtered the word "steps" sorry. I've never seen this terminology, you mean the finite "sub-colimits?". In that case definitely. | |
| Mar 25, 2020 at 15:21 | comment | added | Jochen Wengenroth | Indeed, the $L^p_{comp}$ topology is stricly finer than the $L^p$-topology, but on the steps they coincide. There is no contradiction. | |
| Mar 25, 2020 at 15:15 | comment | added | ABIM | But in this post: mathoverflow.net/questions/347318/… don't we find that the topology on $L^p_{comp}$ is strictly finer? | |
| Mar 25, 2020 at 15:05 | comment | added | Jochen Wengenroth | Why should this be true? The $L^p_{comp}$-topology gives nothing for the distributional derivatives! You probably know that because of the stricness of the inductive system the relative topology of $L^p_{comp}$ on the steps is just the $L^p$-topology. | |
| S Mar 25, 2020 at 13:56 | history | suggested | ABIM |
added the pde tag
|
|
| Mar 25, 2020 at 13:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 25, 2020 at 13:56 | |||||
| Mar 25, 2020 at 13:43 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting, partly retagged
|
| Mar 25, 2020 at 12:23 | history | asked | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |