Timeline for The Seiberg-Witten equations for forms
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11 at 20:14 | comment | added | Malkoun | trivial remark: if we think of $\theta$ as associated to a connection, then the first equation just says that $\alpha$ is a parallel $2$-form with respect to that connection. The second equation seems to say something about the curvature of this connection. | |
| Jan 11 at 20:05 | history | edited | Antoine Balan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 11 at 19:57 | history | edited | Antoine Balan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
| Mar 27, 2023 at 2:32 | history | edited | Antoine Balan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| May 19, 2021 at 6:18 | history | edited | Antoine Balan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 24 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2020 at 18:31 | comment | added | Antoine Balan | But there is a real analogy between these equations and those of Seiberg-Witten. The question deserves to be posed. | |
| Mar 22, 2020 at 17:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 25, 2020 at 8:26 | |||||
| Mar 22, 2020 at 16:54 | comment | added | Chris Gerig | You're asking a big question (almost homework-like), like "show me how to build a cohomology theory", without demonstrating any attempt yourself, which is why I voted to close. I recommend understanding how the ordinary Seiberg-Witten invariants are defined, and check it for yourself (do you have an elliptic equation, transversality, appropriate index, compactness, etc.). | |
| Mar 22, 2020 at 16:52 | history | edited | Antoine Balan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2020 at 16:39 | history | edited | Antoine Balan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2020 at 16:15 | history | edited | Antoine Balan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2020 at 16:03 | history | asked | Antoine Balan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |