Skip to main content
29 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 27, 2020 at 21:57 comment added Manuel Rivera What @RyanBudney is saying is similar to what I proposed below. However, the cool observation from our work is that this process is a purely algebraic one, namely it can be obtained by applying a series of functors to the ( $E_2$ ) coalgebra of singular chains without knowing that it came from a space! Moreover, the construction can be understood as part of an abstract homotopy theory (coalgebras under Koszul weak equivalences).
Mar 26, 2020 at 22:12 comment added GSM @RyanBudney In some sense I wanted to use the information in the chain complex $C_{\ast}(X)$ and deduce a chain model $C_{\ast}(\tilde{X})$ without allowing a purely topological manipulation as lifting cells. My idea was that the homology of the covering space is encoded in $C_{\ast}(X)$ + extra structure such as "cocommutative" structure of the chain. I know my justification is maybe a little bit artificial :)
Mar 26, 2020 at 22:06 comment added Ryan Budney The universal cover of a CW-complex is a CW-complex, you obtain the CW-structure by taking all lifts of all the cells of the original space. Once you have a CW-complex, you can form the cellular chain complex, just like how one computes the homology of any CW-complex, as presented in introductory algebraic topology textbooks. What about this does not answer your question?
Mar 26, 2020 at 22:03 comment added GSM @RyanBudney Dear Ryan, I guess I just did not really understand your comment, It is probably my poor knowledge! I really would appreciate to understand more your comment! Could you please write it down your spectral sequence ?
Mar 26, 2020 at 21:48 comment added Ryan Budney @GSM: Could you explain what you do not like about my "collapsed spectral sequence" argument, i.e. just lifting the CW complex to the universal cover, and "computing" with that?
Mar 26, 2020 at 17:40 history edited GSM CC BY-SA 4.0
added 272 characters in body
Mar 26, 2020 at 9:14 comment added HJRW @GSM The problem is as follows: "Is there an algorithm that takes as input a finite 2-complex $X$, guaranteed to be aspherical, and decides whether or not $\pi_1X$ is trivial?". The problem is related to the Andrews--Curtis conjecture, and thence to the smooth 4-dimensional Poincare conjecture.
S Mar 26, 2020 at 9:02 history bounty ended GSM
S Mar 26, 2020 at 9:02 history notice removed GSM
Mar 26, 2020 at 9:01 vote accept GSM
Mar 26, 2020 at 3:08 answer added Manuel Rivera timeline score: 6
Mar 25, 2020 at 22:55 comment added GSM @HJRW I am curious about your statement " the triviality problem for aspherical presentations is a famous open problem" could you give more details about this open problem, please ? thank you.
Mar 25, 2020 at 22:47 comment added HJRW @RyanBudney -- that's a great way of putting it. Of course, by "knowing" the fundamental group, people often mean they know a presentation for it. But the undecidability of the triviality problem shows that, even if we know a presentation, we don't know the universal cover, in the sense that we don't know if it's proper or not. Of course, the triviality problem for aspherical presentations is a famous open problem, so it's hard to answer the question this way, given the stipulation that $\pi_2$ is also known.
S Mar 25, 2020 at 15:08 history suggested sound wave CC BY-SA 4.0
"now" instead of "know", however I removed it since "know" already appears before the enumerate list, moreover in this way there is symmetry wrt to first item of the list
Mar 25, 2020 at 14:36 review Suggested edits
S Mar 25, 2020 at 15:08
Mar 21, 2020 at 16:05 comment added GSM @RyanBudney I would like to illustrate the words "know" and "compute" by an example. Lets say we have the inverse problem, we have a group G acting very nicely on a connected space $X$. Suppose I "know" every group homology of $X$ and the induced action of $G$ on the homology of $X$, then theoretically (spectral sequence) allows us to "compute" the homology of the orbit space $X/G$.
Mar 20, 2020 at 20:45 comment added Ryan Budney Your question is somewhat problematic. What do you mean by "computing"? What does it mean to "know" $\pi_1(X)$? If you "know" the fundamental group, presumably you "know" the cellular chain complex for the universal cover -- that is a collapsed spectral sequence that computes the homology, i.e. the best kind. So what is your objection to that?
Mar 20, 2020 at 14:59 answer added Phil Tosteson timeline score: 5
Mar 20, 2020 at 14:45 answer added user153879 timeline score: 7
S Mar 20, 2020 at 12:19 history bounty started GSM
S Mar 20, 2020 at 12:19 history notice added GSM Canonical answer required
Mar 18, 2020 at 10:22 comment added HJRW Absent knowlede of $\pi_2(X)$, the problem of computing $H_2(\widetilde{X})\cong\pi_2(X)$ is known to be undecidable. Perhaps there's a similar undecidibility result for higher-dimensional homology groups, even with knowledge of the higher homotopy groups?
Mar 18, 2020 at 9:28 history edited GSM CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Mar 17, 2020 at 21:01 comment added Connor Malin I suppose it doesn’t actually do anything besides tell you you can compute the homology of the universal cover via local coefficients
Mar 17, 2020 at 20:21 answer added user43326 timeline score: 5
Mar 17, 2020 at 19:19 history edited GSM CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Mar 17, 2020 at 19:11 comment added GSM @ConnorMalin I'm not sure this spectral sequence would be helpful, unless i'm wrong...
Mar 17, 2020 at 19:04 comment added Connor Malin There is a spectral sequence (the Serre spectral sequence) which involves homology of the base space with local coefficients, but as far as I know the easiest way to compute homology with local coefficients is via homology of its covers.
Mar 17, 2020 at 18:52 history asked GSM CC BY-SA 4.0