Timeline for Conductors of non-abelian number fields?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2009 at 1:26 | answer | added | JSE | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 31, 2009 at 17:45 | answer | added | Jonah Sinick | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 31, 2009 at 17:04 | history | edited | Rob Harron | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
explain "non-abelian number field", and ref for definition of conductor in abelian case
|
| Oct 31, 2009 at 17:02 | comment | added | Rob Harron | Yeah, sorry. Similarly, abelian means with abelian Galois group. And the Galois group I mean is that over Q. You can also define the conductor of an extension of number fields L/K with abelian Galois group (again using the Artin reciprocity map). | |
| Oct 31, 2009 at 16:49 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | Sorry, does non-abelian mean "with non-abelian Galois group"? | |
| Oct 31, 2009 at 16:46 | answer | added | David Zureick-Brown | timeline score: -1 | |
| Oct 31, 2009 at 15:00 | history | asked | Rob Harron | CC BY-SA 2.5 |