Skip to main content
explain "non-abelian number field", and ref for definition of conductor in abelian case
Source Link
Rob Harron
  • 4.8k
  • 2
  • 25
  • 35

Is there a definition out there of the notion of conductor of a non-abelian number field (i.e. a finite extension of Q whose Galois group is non-abelian)? If not, is there anyone you know of working on it? The definition for abelian number fields uses class field theory; it comes out of Artin reciprocity (see page 525 of Neukirch's Algebraic number theory).

Is there a definition out there of the notion of conductor of a non-abelian number field? If not, is there anyone you know of working on it? The definition for abelian number fields uses class field theory; it comes out of Artin reciprocity.

Is there a definition out there of the notion of conductor of a non-abelian number field (i.e. a finite extension of Q whose Galois group is non-abelian)? If not, is there anyone you know of working on it? The definition for abelian number fields uses class field theory; it comes out of Artin reciprocity (see page 525 of Neukirch's Algebraic number theory).

Source Link
Rob Harron
  • 4.8k
  • 2
  • 25
  • 35

Conductors of non-abelian number fields?

Is there a definition out there of the notion of conductor of a non-abelian number field? If not, is there anyone you know of working on it? The definition for abelian number fields uses class field theory; it comes out of Artin reciprocity.