Timeline for About a possible extension of Siegel-Walfisz theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2020 at 11:02 | comment | added | Wojowu | @SylvainJULIEN Thanks, the typo was a missing factor. I don't know to what extent the result holds if $q$ has small factors. I suspect that if it has few factors below $\log q$ (something like, their product is $(\log q)^{O(1)}$), then the result remains valid. | |
| Mar 6, 2020 at 11:01 | history | edited | Wojowu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Mar 6, 2020 at 10:59 | comment | added | Sylvain JULIEN | Also, the hypothesis is "a number $q$ with no prime factors below $\log q$" but does the theorem apply if some prime factors of $q$ are below $\log q$ while others are bigger? | |
| Mar 6, 2020 at 10:45 | comment | added | Sylvain JULIEN | Your answer is instructive but there must be a typo cause the interval to which $x$ belongs is empty. | |
| Mar 6, 2020 at 9:53 | vote | accept | Sylvain JULIEN | ||
| Mar 6, 2020 at 9:50 | history | answered | Wojowu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |