Skip to main content
deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 366
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

We first mention our motivation: For $M=\mathbb{R}$ with usual Riemannian metric the exp map $exp:TM\to M$ is in the form$(x,v)\mapsto x+v$ This map defines a foliation, viaThe level sets of exp of this map, define a foliation whose leaves are totally geodesic submanifolds with respect to Sasaki metric of $TM$. They intersect the zero section transversaly. The number of intersections with the zero section is the same for all leaves. They are parallel in the sense that for every two two points points $x,y$ in $M\subset TM$ and every $M$- geodesic curve $\gamma $ joining $x$ to $y$, the tangent space of the leaf passing $x$ is parallel transported along $\gamma$ to thats of $y$.

How can one generalize some or all part of this situation in the case of an arbitrary (compact) Riemannian manifold? Under which conditions on Riemannian manifold, all or some partparts of these situationsituations are the case?

We first mention our motivation: For $M=\mathbb{R}$ with usual Riemannian metric the exp map $exp:TM\to M$ is in the form$(x,v)\mapsto x+v$ This map defines a foliation, via level sets of exp map, whose leaves are totally geodesic submanifolds with respect to Sasaki metric. They intersect the zero section transversaly. The number of intersections with the zero section is the same for all leaves. They are parallel in the sense that for every two two points $x,y$ in $M\subset TM$ and every $M$- geodesic curve $\gamma $ joining $x$ to $y$, the tangent space of the leaf passing $x$ is parallel transported along $\gamma$ to thats of $y$.

How can one generalize some or all part of this situation in the case of an arbitrary (compact) Riemannian manifold? Under which conditions on Riemannian manifold, all or some part of these situation are the case?

We first mention our motivation: For $M=\mathbb{R}$ with usual Riemannian metric the exp map $exp:TM\to M$ is in the form$(x,v)\mapsto x+v$ The level sets of this map define a foliation whose leaves are totally geodesic submanifolds with respect to Sasaki metric of $TM$. They intersect the zero section transversaly. The number of intersections with the zero section is the same for all leaves. They are parallel in the sense that for every two points $x,y$ in $M\subset TM$ and every $M$- geodesic curve $\gamma $ joining $x$ to $y$, the tangent space of the leaf passing $x$ is parallel transported along $\gamma$ to thats of $y$.

How can one generalize some or all part of this situation in the case of an arbitrary (compact) Riemannian manifold? Under which conditions on Riemannian manifold, all or some parts of these situations are the case?

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 366
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

We first mention our motivation: For $M=\mathbb{R}$ with usual Riemannian metric the exp map $exp:TM\to M$ is in the form$(x,v)\mapsto x+v$ This map defines a foliation, via level sets of exp map, whose leaves are totally geodesic submanifolds with respect to Sasaki metric. They intersect the zero section transversaly. The number of intersections with the zero section is the same for all leaves. They are parallel in the sense that for every two two points $x,y$ in $M\subset TM$ and every $M$- geodesic curve $\gamma $ joining $x$ to $y$ contained in zero section, the tangent space of the leaf passing $x$ is parallel transported along $\gamma$ to thats of $y$.

How can one generalize some or all part of this situation in the case of an arbitrary (compact) Riemannian manifold? Under which conditions on Riemannian manifold, all or some part of these situation are the case?

We first mention our motivation: For $M=\mathbb{R}$ with usual Riemannian metric the exp map $exp:TM\to M$ is in the form$(x,v)\mapsto x+v$ This map defines a foliation, via level sets of exp map, whose leaves are totally geodesic submanifolds with respect to Sasaki metric. They intersect the zero section transversaly. The number of intersections with the zero section is the same for all leaves. They are parallel in the sense that for every two two points $x,y$ in $M\subset TM$ and every geodesic curve joining $x$ to $y$ contained in zero section, the tangent space of the leaf passing $x$ is parallel transported to thats of $y$.

How can one generalize some or all part of this situation in the case of an arbitrary (compact) Riemannian manifold? Under which conditions on Riemannian manifold, all or some part of these situation are the case?

We first mention our motivation: For $M=\mathbb{R}$ with usual Riemannian metric the exp map $exp:TM\to M$ is in the form$(x,v)\mapsto x+v$ This map defines a foliation, via level sets of exp map, whose leaves are totally geodesic submanifolds with respect to Sasaki metric. They intersect the zero section transversaly. The number of intersections with the zero section is the same for all leaves. They are parallel in the sense that for every two two points $x,y$ in $M\subset TM$ and every $M$- geodesic curve $\gamma $ joining $x$ to $y$, the tangent space of the leaf passing $x$ is parallel transported along $\gamma$ to thats of $y$.

How can one generalize some or all part of this situation in the case of an arbitrary (compact) Riemannian manifold? Under which conditions on Riemannian manifold, all or some part of these situation are the case?

added 28 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 366
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

We first mention our motivation: For $M=\mathbb{R}$ with usual Riemannian metric the exp map $exp:TM\to M$ is in the form$(x,v)\mapsto x+v$ This map defines a foliation, via level sets of exp map, whose leaves are totally geodesic submanifolds with respect to Sasaki metric. They intersect the zero section transversaly. The number of intersections with the zero section is the same for all leaves. They are parallel in the sense that for every two two points $x,y$ in $M\subset TM$ and every geodesic curve joining $x$ to $y$ contained in zero section, the tangent space of the leaf passing $x$ is parallel transported to thats of $y$.

How can one generalize some or all part of this situation in the case of an arbitrary (compact) Riemannian manifold? Under which conditions on Riemannian manifold, all or some part of these situation are the case?

We first mention our motivation: For $M=\mathbb{R}$ with usual Riemannian metric the exp map $exp:TM\to M$ is in the form$(x,v)\mapsto x+v$ This map defines a foliation whose leaves are totally geodesic submanifolds with respect to Sasaki metric. They intersect the zero section transversaly. The number of intersections with the zero section is the same for all leaves. They are parallel in the sense that for every two two points $x,y$ in $M\subset TM$ and every geodesic curve joining $x$ to $y$ contained in zero section, the tangent space of the leaf passing $x$ is parallel transported to thats of $y$.

How can one generalize some or all part of this situation in the case of an arbitrary (compact) Riemannian manifold? Under which conditions on Riemannian manifold, all or some part of these situation are the case?

We first mention our motivation: For $M=\mathbb{R}$ with usual Riemannian metric the exp map $exp:TM\to M$ is in the form$(x,v)\mapsto x+v$ This map defines a foliation, via level sets of exp map, whose leaves are totally geodesic submanifolds with respect to Sasaki metric. They intersect the zero section transversaly. The number of intersections with the zero section is the same for all leaves. They are parallel in the sense that for every two two points $x,y$ in $M\subset TM$ and every geodesic curve joining $x$ to $y$ contained in zero section, the tangent space of the leaf passing $x$ is parallel transported to thats of $y$.

How can one generalize some or all part of this situation in the case of an arbitrary (compact) Riemannian manifold? Under which conditions on Riemannian manifold, all or some part of these situation are the case?

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 366
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
edited title
Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 366
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 366
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading