Timeline for Evaluation of the quality of research articles submitted in mathematical journals: how do they do that?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2020 at 18:58 | history | edited | Piotr Hajlasz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1261 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2020 at 17:06 | history | edited | Piotr Hajlasz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1269 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2020 at 7:43 | vote | accept | user142929 | ||
| Feb 26, 2020 at 2:28 | comment | added | Piotr Hajlasz | @Kimball Good point. The question was mostly about the role of the editorial board, but you are right I should also say about the role of referees. I will try to do it later when I will have time. | |
| Feb 26, 2020 at 2:24 | comment | added | Kimball | This answer is informative, but I feel like it doesn't clearly express the referees' role in evaluating the quality. | |
| Feb 25, 2020 at 15:49 | history | edited | Piotr Hajlasz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 805 characters in body
|
| S Feb 25, 2020 at 15:38 | history | answered | Piotr Hajlasz | CC BY-SA 4.0 | |
| S Feb 25, 2020 at 15:38 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Piotr Hajlasz |