Timeline for The formula for (and computation of) the inverse p-adic mellin transform
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2020 at 11:28 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Feb 9, 2020 at 4:11 | answer | added | wskrsk | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 9, 2020 at 3:57 | vote | accept | MCS | ||
| Feb 9, 2020 at 4:22 | |||||
| Feb 9, 2020 at 3:18 | answer | added | KConrad | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 9, 2020 at 2:53 | comment | added | MCS | I've deleted the hostility. xD I had intended it more as a safe-guard against someone giving a patronizing "oh, just look it up yourself" type response. Anyhow, thanks for your time. :D | |
| Feb 9, 2020 at 2:52 | history | edited | MCS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 588 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2020 at 1:56 | comment | added | LSpice | I think that the correct answer is somewhere between your first and second formula: $$\mathscr M_p^{-1}\{F\}(\mathfrak z) = \frac1{2\pi i}\int_{\sigma-i\pi}^{\sigma+i\pi}\frac{F(s)}{\lvert\mathfrak z\rvert_p^s}\mathrm ds.$$ I'll check details and post later. However, in the meantime, while your obvious frustration is understandable, I think that it's not necessary to give such an apparently hostile pre- and post-lude to your question; perhaps it suffices to respond to such bad behaviour only after it happens here? | |
| Feb 9, 2020 at 0:20 | history | asked | MCS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |