Timeline for Fibration of principal bundles
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2020 at 17:10 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 9, 2020 at 3:05 | |||||
| Feb 8, 2020 at 17:06 | vote | accept | GSM | ||
| S Feb 8, 2020 at 17:05 | history | bounty ended | GSM | ||
| S Feb 8, 2020 at 17:05 | history | notice removed | GSM | ||
| Feb 6, 2020 at 0:39 | answer | added | Nicholas Kuhn | timeline score: 4 | |
| S Feb 5, 2020 at 22:59 | history | bounty started | GSM | ||
| S Feb 5, 2020 at 22:59 | history | notice added | GSM | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Feb 3, 2020 at 18:44 | answer | added | John Greenwood | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 3, 2020 at 18:23 | comment | added | GSM | @JohnGreenwood does it help if Z/G is paracompact ? I will be happy to see if it works in the case of paracompact spaces... | |
| Feb 3, 2020 at 18:20 | comment | added | John Greenwood | Can we assume Z/G is paracompact? | |
| Feb 3, 2020 at 18:10 | history | edited | GSM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 811 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2020 at 12:25 | history | edited | GSM |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 3, 2020 at 8:56 | history | edited | GSM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2020 at 8:42 | comment | added | GSM | @BenMcKay yes f is G-equivariant. | |
| Feb 3, 2020 at 8:37 | comment | added | Ben McKay | Is $f$ $G$-equivariant? | |
| Feb 3, 2020 at 7:45 | comment | added | GSM | @JohnGreenwood I have edited my question, I hope it is clear. | |
| Feb 3, 2020 at 7:44 | history | edited | GSM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 135 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2020 at 5:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 5, 2020 at 23:00 | |||||
| Feb 3, 2020 at 5:36 | comment | added | John Greenwood | What exactly do you mean by "map" of $G$-principal bundles? If it is the usual definition (equivariant and commutes with the projection maps) then it must be an isomorphism... | |
| Feb 2, 2020 at 20:28 | history | asked | GSM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |