Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 29, 2022 at 8:19 comment added Jo Mo I always use the $\flat$ and $\sharp$ notation as well, but in the exactly opposite way. It seems to make more sense to me.
Feb 8, 2020 at 19:10 comment added Jérôme JEAN-CHARLES The floor is very nice and was always my prefered one. Yet (depending on the context of course) you may be willing to use the ad notation.
Feb 2, 2020 at 1:29 comment added Robert Furber @WorldSEnder I think I've used this notation myself, and it comes by analogy to the fact that floor and ceiling are adjoints to the inclusion of posets $\mathbb{Z} \hookrightarrow \mathbb{R}$.
Feb 1, 2020 at 23:53 comment added WorldSEnder I've seen the notation $\lceil f \rceil$ and $\lfloor f \rfloor$ being used for the isomorphism, mainly in a few comp sci papers
Feb 1, 2020 at 21:11 comment added Fred Rohrer I am quite sure that the "ad"-notation does not occur in EGA outside the cited section.
Feb 1, 2020 at 20:47 comment added Martin Brandenburg Let me also remark that the same section introduces a notation for the bijection $$\hom(F(x),y) \xrightarrow{\sim} \hom(x,F^{\text{ad}}(y)),$$ namely $f \mapsto f^{\flat}$, and $g \mapsto g^{\sharp}$ for the inverse. At least, this notation can be seen a lot in EGA.
Feb 1, 2020 at 20:39 comment added Martin Brandenburg Yet, this leads to the question why this notation is not common, even not in EGA itself (right?).
Feb 1, 2020 at 20:37 comment added Martin Brandenburg I am very happy about this answer, and I accept it right away (even though there might be other books with other notations) because EGA I has/had such a huge impact. I didn't read all of the preliminaries, so I wasn't aware that this notation is introduced there. Well spotted!
Feb 1, 2020 at 20:35 vote accept Martin Brandenburg
Feb 1, 2020 at 18:13 history answered Fred Rohrer CC BY-SA 4.0