Timeline for P not eq. NP news?: [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2010 at 1:25 | comment | added | Greg Kuperberg | I guess I don't know why either. :-) | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 19:53 | comment | added | David E Speyer | I agree that it would be useful to ask and answer that question once. I don't know why you think this is the best question to alter to that purpose but, if it is edited in that manner, I'd be glad to reopen it. | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 16:29 | comment | added | Greg Kuperberg | I think that it is a mistake to stamp out every version of this question, although the issue has been clouded by poorly phrased questions. The question that was answered below was, "Are there good references that discuss Deolalikar's claimed proof that P ≠ NP?". I think that it's perfectly fair and useful to ask such a question once, if it is phrased that way. | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 12:22 | history | closed |
Harry Gindi Andrea Ferretti Andrew Stacey David E Speyer Victor Protsak |
not a real question | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 11:53 | answer | added | Jeroen | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 11:35 | comment | added | Harun Šiljak | Just to add to my previous comment: there is now a polymath wiki page here: michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/… , so you can be up-to-date with the info there. | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 11:32 | comment | added | Harun Šiljak | See the meta: tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/590 and the closed question: mathoverflow.net/questions/34953/whats-wrong-with-this-proof | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 11:26 | history | asked | Thomas Riepe | CC BY-SA 2.5 |