Timeline for Is the tangent bundle of the long line $L$ homeomorphic to $L\times\mathbb R$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 22, 2021 at 10:37 | history | suggested | glS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
more descriptive title
|
| Dec 22, 2021 at 7:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 22, 2021 at 10:37 | |||||
| Sep 11, 2010 at 19:01 | vote | accept | Zack | ||
| Aug 10, 2010 at 16:09 | comment | added | André Henriques | The long line is weakly contractible (all its homotopy groups are zero) but not contractible (there is no [0,1]-parametrized homotopy between the identity map and the zero map). | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 15:14 | answer | added | Andreas Blass | timeline score: 14 | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 13:42 | answer | added | BS. | timeline score: 11 | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 11:58 | comment | added | BS. | @ Henri : the long line isn't contractible. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_line_(topology) for a list of properties and some references. | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 9:21 | comment | added | Henri | Maybe there's something I don't get, but can't we assert that the line being contractible, any vector bundle on it must be trivial? | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 7:26 | history | asked | Zack | CC BY-SA 2.5 |