Timeline for Question about a lesser-known "class number formula" of Gauss
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 27, 2021 at 11:53 | history | edited | user2554 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 82 characters in body
|
Feb 26, 2021 at 10:37 | answer | added | user2554 | timeline score: 4 | |
Jan 22, 2020 at 5:05 | comment | added | José Hdz. Stgo. | @CarloBeenakker: I wonder if the OP is aware of this previous question in MO: mathoverflow.net/a/109396/1593 | |
Jan 21, 2020 at 21:14 | vote | accept | user2554 | ||
Jan 21, 2020 at 16:42 | comment | added | M. Khan | If I recall correctly there may be some information on this in Ayoub's book "Introduction to Analytic Number Theory". Having said this, I have not looked at this book for many years and I do not have easy access to a copy. | |
Jan 21, 2020 at 7:56 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | @JoséHdz.Stgo. --- I presume with "reference for this result of Gauss", the OP means "a reference which discusses this result of Gauss". | |
Jan 21, 2020 at 6:52 | history | became hot network question | |||
Jan 21, 2020 at 5:35 | comment | added | José Hdz. Stgo. | Mmmh... Isn't art. 301 of the Disquisitiones a reference for this result of Gauß? | |
Jan 21, 2020 at 4:56 | history | edited | José Hdz. Stgo. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
Jan 21, 2020 at 1:28 | comment | added | alpoge | He gives an asymptotic for the number of genera, which is akin to giving an asymptotic for $\sum_{n\leq X} 2^{\omega(n)}$ —- hence the log. [Note that he says genera around $+D$ or $-D$, and $h(-D)$ is way bigger.] Let me know if I’ve misunderstood! | |
Jan 20, 2020 at 23:44 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 20, 2020 at 23:42 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 9 | |
Jan 20, 2020 at 22:47 | history | asked | user2554 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |