Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 3, 2020 at 20:18 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Link to paper
Jan 19, 2020 at 13:44 comment added John Klein @user43326 even with the notation you say you like to use (and which I don't), it would have been more correct to write $BG_+$ rather than $BG$.
Jan 19, 2020 at 9:18 comment added Neil Strickland @JohnKlein different people use different notation. I would quite often leave the $\Sigma^\infty$ implicit in this kind of context.
Jan 19, 2020 at 8:08 comment added user43326 Oh, thank you, I had missed that. In most of my writing, I identify a based space with its suspension spectrum... Corrected now.
Jan 19, 2020 at 0:20 comment added John Klein The expression "$BG$" refers to a space, not a spectrum. You are using incorrect notation. If you want to associate a spectrum to $BG$, you should be writing $\Sigma^\infty (BG_+)$--the suspension spectrum of $BG$. Again, I am saying there is an incorrect statement in the first paragraph of your post.
Jan 17, 2020 at 15:15 comment added user43326 that is exactly what is I am saying, for some authors it is the spectrum and not the infinite loop space...
Jan 17, 2020 at 12:16 comment added John Klein @user43326: every connective spectrum determines an infinite loop space and vice-versa.
Jan 17, 2020 at 12:14 comment added John Klein @user43326 the K-theory of finite free $G$-sets is not $BG$, it is $Q(BG_+)$. Here is a simple reason why it can't be $BG$: the latter is not in general an infiinite loop space (but the $K$-theory is an infinite loop space). By the way, $G$ does not need to be finite in the Barratt-Priddy-Quillen-Segal theorem.
Jan 17, 2020 at 6:48 comment added user43326 Actually I really meant $BG_+$ because some author use the word $k$-theory to mean the associated spectrum (infinite delooping) and not the infinite loop space.
Jan 17, 2020 at 2:10 history answered John Klein CC BY-SA 4.0