Timeline for Why are coarse maps required to be proper?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 16, 2020 at 9:13 | comment | added | Uri Bader | @geodude, none that I am aware of. | |
Jan 16, 2020 at 3:47 | comment | added | geodude | @UriBader I'd love to read that once it's ready. (In the meantime, is there any reference which does not use this convention?) | |
Jan 15, 2020 at 19:23 | comment | added | Uri Bader | * "writing" in my comment above should be taken in the weak sense: this project is kept being postponed due to other administrative duties and more urgent mathematical projects. I am not sure this process is converging for me :( | |
Jan 15, 2020 at 19:23 | comment | added | Uri Bader | I agree with @YCor. I am currently writing* a text taking a categorical perspective on the subject in which I omit the proneness property from the definition. | |
Jan 15, 2020 at 18:47 | comment | added | YCor | It's a strange and unpractical convention, indeed. I encourage you not to include properness in the definition. | |
Jan 15, 2020 at 18:16 | history | asked | geodude | CC BY-SA 4.0 |