Timeline for Relationship between $q$-Weyl dimension formula and $q$-analog of weight multiplicity?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2022 at 15:01 | answer | added | Tamas Hausel | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 21, 2020 at 3:10 | vote | accept | Sam Hopkins | ||
| Jan 21, 2020 at 2:54 | answer | added | Gjergji Zaimi | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 12, 2020 at 2:46 | history | edited | Sam Hopkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 456 characters in body
|
| Jan 10, 2020 at 23:40 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | For the coefficients $c_{\lambda,\mu}(q)$: I am happy to either sum over all $\mu$ or all dominant $\mu$. When $\mu$ is not dominant there are two different things $K_{\lambda,\mu}(q)$ could mean: one is defined in terms of the $q$-Kostant partition function and is "bad" because it can have negative coefficients; the one I want is the one coming from the Brylinski-Kostant filtration. It is known that this second one is equal to $q^{\textrm{some explicit power}} \cdot K_{\lambda,\nu}(q)$ where $\nu$ is the dominant representative of $W\mu$ (see the Joseph-Letzter-Zelikson paper). | |
| Jan 10, 2020 at 18:21 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo; minor TeX fixes; names of papers
|
| Jan 10, 2020 at 18:14 | history | asked | Sam Hopkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |