Timeline for Why do stochastic integrals depend on the choice of partitioning points?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2020 at 23:35 | comment | added | AlexArvanitakis | fair enough I suppose that that comment was cryptic. In quantum mechanical path integrals the choice of time-slicing prescription (the QM analogue of Ito VS Stratonovich) is related to a choice of operator ordering. The symmetric or Weyl ordering corresponds to the QM midpoint prescription which is essentially the Stratonovich integral (in stochastic contexts). I think you can find a discussion in Hagen Kleinert's path integral bible. I also see a discussion in M Chaichian, A Demichev, "Path Integrals in Physics: Volume I Stochastic Processes and Quantum Mechanics" section 2.2.5 | |
| Jan 8, 2020 at 23:13 | answer | added | Kostya_I | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 8, 2020 at 15:21 | history | edited | jak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2020 at 15:21 | comment | added | jak | @AlexArvanitakis can you elaborate or do you have any reference? | |
| Jan 5, 2020 at 2:04 | comment | added | AlexArvanitakis | This is related to an ``ordering ambiguity'' in physics-speak | |
| S Jan 4, 2020 at 17:08 | history | suggested | Oli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix typo in title
|
| Jan 4, 2020 at 16:30 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 4, 2020 at 17:08 | |||||
| Jan 4, 2020 at 14:26 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jan 4, 2020 at 11:50 | answer | added | ofer zeitouni | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jan 4, 2020 at 6:25 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 4, 2020 at 7:39 | |||||
| Jan 4, 2020 at 6:23 | history | asked | jak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |