Timeline for Decomposition of k[G]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2009 at 10:32 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev |
That's what I naively think, but then how to explain the fact that textbooks and papers almost always consider only the case of k=C? What if there are some important nuances?
|
|
| Oct 31, 2009 at 0:15 | comment | added | Fran Burstall | The proof does not use much more than Schur's Lemma and the fact that k[G] is a locally regular repn of G\times G so I guess it goes through for any algebraically closed k. | |
| Oct 30, 2009 at 23:47 | history | answered | Fran Burstall | CC BY-SA 2.5 |