Skip to main content
28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jan 9, 2020 at 5:53 history bounty ended mark
S Jan 9, 2020 at 5:53 history notice removed mark
Jan 5, 2020 at 15:08 comment added mark @Carlo Beenakker Yes, you are right. I miscopied the identity...$\theta$ should be equated to $2\arctan 3^{-\frac{1}{4}}$. Thank you.
Jan 4, 2020 at 20:53 comment added Carlo Beenakker I think $\theta$ should be equated to $2\arctan 3^{-1/4}$, see the answer box where I have tried to work this out in some detail.
Jan 4, 2020 at 19:52 answer added Carlo Beenakker timeline score: 3
Jan 4, 2020 at 16:31 comment added mark Two edits in the bounty offer: $theta$ should be replaced by $\theta$ and $\arctan(1/\sqrt(3)$ should be replaced by $\arctan(1/\sqrt(\sqrt(3))$
S Jan 4, 2020 at 16:26 history bounty started mark
S Jan 4, 2020 at 16:26 history notice added mark Draw attention
Dec 31, 2019 at 20:26 comment added user145307 @ToddTrimble, no problem! I agree with you that the way it was phrased in this particular example was non-optimal and I certainly don't know about past histories.
Dec 31, 2019 at 19:09 comment added Todd Trimble @ElectricPenguin Thanks. Interesting point. I do question your assertion that there is more skill at Mathematics for solving such problems, but next time I see a case where this community finds a definite integral question on-topic and is defeated by it, I'll think about it. But based on a long history, it seems user64494 says the same thing just about every time he sees a definite integral problem for which Mathematica gives an answer (and, tbh, user's formulation sounds a bit rhetorical to me, as if asking "shouldn't you know better?", thus prompting my comment).
Dec 31, 2019 at 16:56 comment added user145307 @ToddTrimble I don't know either the motivation or intention of the person who commented above, but it's pretty clear that there is a lot of expertise on MSE for computing every definite integral under the sun, certainly a lot more than has ever been demonstrated on MO. There's actually a case to be made for some definite integral questions that MSE is a better place because there are more experts there. I would ask you to reflect on whether any suggestion that MSE might be better is automatically "shaming" rather than actually directing the OP to a more useful site.
Dec 31, 2019 at 14:07 history rollback Carlo Beenakker
Rollback to Revision 6
Dec 30, 2019 at 2:05 comment added Todd Trimble @user64494 I agree with Yemon's response. Even worse, such comments serve to "shame" the OP for even asking here, when in fact the question is perfectly on-topic, for the reasons Yemon gave. Please reflect carefully on this.
Dec 30, 2019 at 1:31 comment added Yemon Choi @user64494 Once again, not everything for which a CAS provides an answer (but no explanation!) deserves your "isn't MSE a right forum for such questions". Note that the OP desires a proof, presumably seeking understanding
Dec 29, 2019 at 1:15 review Close votes
Dec 30, 2019 at 1:32
Dec 28, 2019 at 22:03 history edited mark CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Dec 28, 2019 at 20:32 comment added user64494 Mathematica reduces it to $$F\left(2 \cot ^{-1}\left(\sqrt[4]{3}\right)|\frac{1}{4} \left(\sqrt{3}+2\right)\right)=2 F\left(\tan ^{-1}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt[4]{3}}\right)|\frac{1}{4} \left(\sqrt{3}+2\right)\right)$$ with reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/EllipticF.html
Dec 28, 2019 at 20:21 history rollback Carlo Beenakker
Rollback to Revision 4
Dec 28, 2019 at 20:18 answer added Carlo Beenakker timeline score: 1
Dec 28, 2019 at 20:15 comment added user64494 Isn't math.se a right forum for such questions?
Dec 28, 2019 at 20:04 history edited mark CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 9 characters in body
Dec 28, 2019 at 17:45 comment added Joe Silverman Instead of writing $\sqrt{\sqrt3}$, you might use either $3^{1/4}$ or $\sqrt[4]{3}$, LaTeX for the latter is \sqrt[4]{3}.
Dec 28, 2019 at 16:29 comment added mark @DimaPasechnik thank you, now corrected.
Dec 28, 2019 at 16:29 history edited mark CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Dec 28, 2019 at 16:27 comment added Dima Pasechnik your $d\phi$ are not where they should be.
Dec 28, 2019 at 16:24 history edited mark CC BY-SA 4.0
Several changes in the integrand to bring out the fraction
Dec 28, 2019 at 16:06 history edited mark CC BY-SA 4.0
I put parentheses around an upper limit of integration and put "2\phi" in place of "\2phi" in the second integral. I removed the equal sign after the final integral
Dec 28, 2019 at 15:56 history asked mark CC BY-SA 4.0